Print Story Should NASA mess with Yellowstone?
By gmd (Sat Sep 02, 2017 at 08:21:08 PM EST) NASA, astrologers, astrology, global warming, climate change, supervolcanos (all tags)
Supposedly they want to cool it down. Im not sure if this idea is good or if its actually wack.

 What do you think? Can astrologers be trusted with delicate geophysical processes that govern planet earth? Or should they stick to predicting peoples love lives?
< First ride of the year | And the hammers batter down your door >
Should NASA mess with Yellowstone? | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
I would side with the Geomancers by dark nowhere (4.00 / 5) #1 Sat Sep 02, 2017 at 10:34:12 PM EST
NASA should obtain the endorsement of the Geomancers' Guild before going ahead with any plans. Especially since they have a hard time with something as simple as numerology, I think they need to earn our trust before attempting other cross-discipline feats.

Chill out, snowflake.

Hmmm by ucblockhead (4.00 / 3) #2 Sun Sep 03, 2017 at 11:57:21 AM EST
Maybe someone could get a orogene in there to help, though those fuckers are untrustworthy bastards.
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman
That's why this site is so great by gmd (2.00 / 0) #3 Sun Sep 03, 2017 at 02:10:08 PM EST
Within hours of pointing out a problem, husi's users come up with real workable solutions... 

gmd - HuSi's second most dimwitted overprivileged user.
[ Parent ]
Workable? I dunno... by dark nowhere (4.00 / 1) #5 Mon Sep 04, 2017 at 04:44:26 PM EST
Even Einstein had trouble getting that stuff working.

Chill out, snowflake.

[ Parent ]
yellowstone is the ultimate antifascist. by the mariner (4.00 / 1) #4 Sun Sep 03, 2017 at 10:42:33 PM EST
verrit code: 420696969

Should NASA mess with Yellowstone? | 5 comments (5 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback