Print Story Salvage Love
Diary
By TheophileEscargot (Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 02:47:00 PM EST) Reading, Watching, MLP (all tags)
Reading: "Salvage", "The Case for Books", "The Slap". Watching: "Sweet and Lowdown". Links.


What I'm Reading
Salvage by Robert Edric is another dystopian near future novel by a mainstream novelist. In a future Britain beset by flooding and chilled by the absence of the Gulf Stream, a government inspector arrives in a Northern town to audit a new development project.

The future Britain is impressively well-realised, with lots of detail and a compellingly bleak atmosphere. Mainstream writers often skimp on world-building, but the author's experience with historical fiction seems to have helped him at that. It helps that he doesn't go over the top with apocalyptic imagery, it has something of the grim realism of Octavia Butler's "Parable" books.

The characters are believable though not sympathetic. There isn't that much plot except as scaffolding for mood and symbolism.

Overall, a compelling downbeat vision of a plausible future, worth reading.

What I'm Reading
The Case for Books by Robert Darnton is a collection of essays about books. The author is an academic who has researched the history of books, but also worked in publishing, which gives him an interesting set of insights. Some of the essays are about the future of eBooks, especially Amazon's digitization project, some go into the history of books.

The book is a couple of years out of date, from before the Kindle broke into the mainstream, so the future stuff already feels a little out of date. The historical essays are more interesting, especially when he goes into the details of how a particular bookseller distributed Voltaire.

Overall, somewhat interesting, but a bit too scattershot and a bit too dated.

Review.

What I'm Reading
Finally got around to reading The Slap by Christos Tsiolkas, the 2010 bestselling novel that got a lot of attention, and was made into a mini-series. At a barbecue in the Australian suburbs, a parent slaps someone else's kid, and the book follows the chain of consequences from multiple points of view, giving a kaleidoscopic insight into the network of families affected.

The book actually does live up to the hype. Tsiolkas has a John Updike-like knack for getting convincingly into the inner lives of his characters. The society is depicted convincingly, and while he touches on many Issues, Tsiolkas never gets preachy or heavy handed. Definitely worth reading.

What I'm Watching
Saw Sweet and Lowdown. on DVD. Woody Allen directed fake-documentary about a jazz guitarist in the Thirties. A gentle tragi-comedy, not that many laughs but some good performances, especially Samantha Morton as the guitarist's mute girlfriend.

What I'm Watching 2
Saw the BBC documentary The Secret History of Our Streets - Deptford High Street. Devastating account of how post-war developers helped destroy part of South London in a doomed attempt to move people into tower blocks.

Well worth seeing.

Did feel a bit unfair to the lone survivor of the planners, who's presented as a bit of scapegoat. He could only have been a junior at the time, and was far from the only person to fail to realise tower blocks would be a disaster.

Links
Socioconomics/Business. Behind Berlin's cheap rents. Focus on the average not the talented: "it was concentration on that tedious day-to-day stuff that made companies succeed". Why Elites Fail.

Video. Crab eats banana. Mario attacks. Red Letter Media drones out long list of spoiler-filled Prometheus questions.

Sci/Tech. Today's kids not inattentive. GM crops can require less pesticide.

Articles. Why smart people are stupid, via. Fred Pohl says goodbye to Ray Bradbury.

Pics. Retro concept art.

< looks like I'm about to join the VW TDI community | So we were having this conversation, >
Salvage Love | 20 comments (20 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
I saw that Deptford documentary by Herring (4.00 / 1) #1 Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 03:03:26 PM EST
Interesting and depressing.

Deep Blue/In ’97 I voted for you/As Sports Personality of the Year


I saw it too by dmg (4.00 / 1) #3 Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 05:10:30 PM EST
What struck a chord with me was how very little things have changed. The political "elite" (even the tin-pot local government types) still believe they know what's best for the chavs and plebs who cede them power through their ignorance and apathy, and still indulge in doomed attempts at social engineering.

I especially enjoyed the bit with the suez veteran talking about shooting up the pub.

If you liked that you might also enjoy the documentary about Smithfield meat market that was on recently. I believe it's available on youtub.
--
dmg - HuSi's most dimwitted overprivileged user.
[ Parent ]

"Why Smart People are Stupid" by ucblockhead (4.00 / 3) #2 Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 03:35:33 PM EST
Bad headline.  This is what they found:

College undergraduates who have high SAT scores lack common sense.

If I had an exponentially increasing set of nickels for every psych study that pretended testing educated 19-21 year old middle class students was adequate for making statements about the general population, I'd have a lot of nickels.

Confusing test scores with general intelligence is equally stupid, here multiplied by the pretense that the SAT reports intelligence.  (Since SAT scores are strongly influenced by parental income these days.)
---
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman


Cold dystopian novels making a comeback? by Breaker (4.00 / 1) #4 Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 06:23:17 PM EST
I read one in the late 80s as a cheapie from a car boot sale.
England in a new ice age (which was the precursor the ozone damage global warming climate change climate chaos whatever we're calling natural change in the planet's ecosystem this week, everyone was piling into Africa, which gave a reverse colonial perspective.

Slap: having spent a lot of time with Greek and Italian /Cypriot 2nd/3rd gen Aussies, I read it more of a critique of what it meant to be a "wog" (their word for themselves, not mine) in Oz.  Wasn't overly impressed mind; too stereotyped and once the grand scene had been set it rapidly descended into trash novel status; boning the staff, keep up with the Joneses fodder, drink and drugs success/fails etc.




Elites fail... by wumpus (4.00 / 1) #5 Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 07:16:22 PM EST
Yes, the 1% (upper crust, whatever) will pull further and further away. What seems missing is that with all this super-duper education, the guy seems to have failed to notice that increasing wealth increases income, ie:
dw/dt=f()w
where f() is the the benefit your wealth has on your income (presumably a function of many things, mostly your wealth). It is strictly positive. A single class that included differential equations should show that the distribution of income is going to be at least exponential, and remain exponential or greater (meaning nearly all new wealth will be showered on the elite). This story gets repeated on and on, but nobody seems to look at the basic math.

Wumpus



It is not sufficient to succeed by dmg (4.00 / 1) #6 Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 09:51:25 PM EST
Others must fail. The politics of envy is alive and well. Your average 99%-er lives like a king compared to his very recent ancestors, yet he is blinded to how good he has got it by his jealousy of others.
--
dmg - HuSi's most dimwitted overprivileged user.
[ Parent ]

Don't really see it by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 2) #8 Sat Jun 16, 2012 at 02:14:59 AM EST
"Your average 99%-er lives like a king compared to his very recent ancestors"

The baby boomers were better off than their parents. But subsequent generations have seen stagnating median earnings, home ownership is more difficult, and they face much more precarious employment and retirement prospects. They're not really living like kings compared with their parents, unless perhaps like Shakesperian kings in constant fear and paranoia over who's going to try to stab or poison them next...
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

Go back to the 1800s by lm (4.00 / 2) #9 Sat Jun 16, 2012 at 10:20:31 AM EST
No electricity, many (most?) without indoor plumbing.

Save for the manor born, most houses would be considered hovels, barely large enough to be a proper shed. Compare that to the size of the average house being bought or sold today.

You have to go down pretty far to bottom of today's 99% to get the sort of material conditions that the average joe of yesteryear would  not have thought of as as kind of swanky.

However true this may be, it's also misleading in a number of ways.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Exactly by dmg (4.00 / 1) #11 Sat Jun 16, 2012 at 04:33:32 PM EST
Shocking child mortality, little if any democratic representation, rampant criminality, religious persecution,, war, disease, serfdom etc.
--
dmg - HuSi's most dimwitted overprivileged user.
[ Parent ]

Depends on what you mean by "worse" by ucblockhead (2.00 / 0) #16 Sun Jun 17, 2012 at 01:38:01 PM EST
My great-grandparents were given free land to work with the only requirement be that they work it.  They had little taxes and no debt and thus had the stability of knowing that as long as they put in a reasonable amount of effort, they'd have a decent living despite having no education whatsoever.
---
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman
[ Parent ]

Right, by dmg (2.00 / 0) #20 Wed Jun 20, 2012 at 07:45:02 PM EST
I'm guessing your great grandparents were alive around the turn of the century?

So their chances of contracting a deadly disease were much higher for a start...

Then there's the sheer drudgery of daily life, due to the lack of labour saving devices.

No cellphones, no air conditioning, no computers, no aircraft, etc etc etc.
--
dmg - HuSi's most dimwitted overprivileged user.
[ Parent ]

How recent is a recent ancestor anyway? by Scrymarch (4.00 / 1) #12 Sun Jun 17, 2012 at 12:33:56 AM EST


Iambic Web Certified

[ Parent ]

Depends on what you mean by recent by lm (4.00 / 1) #13 Sun Jun 17, 2012 at 08:09:55 AM EST
I only have to go back three generations to get to ancestors who were born in the 1800s, four generations to get to ancestors who lived most of their lives in the eighteen hundreds. Recent, in that sense, goes back pretty far, pretty quickly.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Well by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #14 Sun Jun 17, 2012 at 09:38:04 AM EST
I still think it's a bit overoptimistic to think you can make the 99% happy by saying "Hey, you may be worse off than your parents, but look how much better off you are than your great-great-grandparents!"
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

I'm more or less with you on that by lm (2.00 / 0) #15 Sun Jun 17, 2012 at 01:04:24 PM EST
Recall that I mentioned that dmg's comment was misleading. However true it may be that average people are better off materially in some ways now than all but the 1% were a few generations ago, making that comparison obscures some important differences in some key areas: quality of life, amount of leisure time, unfulfilled expectations, et cetera.

I was just trying to draw out what dmg was getting at. I wasn't trying to say that the reason he was throwing that out there makes a whole lot of sense.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

I'm two generations from the 1800s by ambrosen (4.00 / 1) #17 Sun Jun 17, 2012 at 07:37:58 PM EST
But I'm also an awful lot poorer than all 4 of my grandparents, all of whom had lived abroad separately by my age, and both couples owned houses outright through their own earnings, both of which would now cost 40 years' median salary.

I live in a flat that is a third of a house that was built in the 1700s for stonemasons. Each flat costs 4 years' median salary.

I'm really grateful for everything that I have, and I have a privileged background, but I just thought I'd point out that in Western Europe and Eastern North America, there is a 200 year/ 6 or 7 generation history of a class of people who haven't gone without.

[ Parent ]

What are you saying? by lm (2.00 / 0) #18 Mon Jun 18, 2012 at 08:41:37 AM EST
Wasn't 19th century England a complete Dickensian nightmare where all kids had to go to forced labor camps or prostitute themselves on the street?

No, but seriously. As I mentioned, above, I think dmg's comment is more misleading than it is illuminative. It's mostly true but the comparison is easy to take the wrong way. Unless it actually is the case that the average household of the 19th century was the sort of working class household straight out of Dickens, I think most of the comparison leaves out rather important things such as leisure time. And I suspect that if the whole of the 19th century was the world of Oliver Twist that there have been no one to buy Dicken's works.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Yeah, that was far better put than I did by ambrosen (2.00 / 0) #19 Mon Jun 18, 2012 at 09:17:01 AM EST
But it's hard to remember quite how sophisticated life was when it relief on technologies other than the current ones. Life without electricity was still complex and there was still heat and a little light.

[ Parent ]

Re: GM crops reduce pesticide use by R343L (4.00 / 1) #7 Fri Jun 15, 2012 at 10:42:11 PM EST
Anyone who has been paying attention knew that already though I'm glad more studies are being done. Plus it showed benefits to neighboring fields, which is pretty awesome. We need better and more ways to fight pests without lots and lots of chemicals that mostly runoff.

"There will be time, there will be time / To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet." -- Eliot


Meh. by ammoniacal (4.00 / 1) #10 Sat Jun 16, 2012 at 10:34:22 AM EST
MANCHU's no Chris Foss, for damned sure.

You can't handle my complete attention.


Salvage Love | 20 comments (20 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback