Fat-Free Mass Index. Essentially, a BMI calculation using only lean body weight. By coincidence, it seems that 25 is about as high as people get without drugs. I'd like to read more of the documentation behind this, because I think they may have been looking solely at lean athletes. A Paul Anderson type (to refer to somebody in the pre-drug era), I would think, would have a much higher FFMI at the expense of also having a lot more fat on him. Still, most of us aren't in that boat. Anyway, I think that figure, the FFMI, and another figure I'm inventing right now, BMI-FFMI=Fat Mass Index (FMI), are probably a lot more useful than BMI. I mean, if you have somebody with a 30 BMI but its principle components are 25 and 5, that person is probably pretty healthy, but it the components are 18 and 12, that is not as good. But this is all just "interesting" rather than scientific information.
In other fitness news, there's a 4-year-old 18,000 post thread making fun of "Crossfit" somewhere. I've been catching up on it slowly in spare moments at work and such. More than half of the posts have been in the past year. It is enlightening to watch the hate grow. It is like a finely-aged wine.
Taxes! We need to find time to discuss them. I just have a couple little things to do, but I want to talk about them with Teh Wife at some point. It seems we're getting money back this year, which is nice.
I had two beers on Saturday. Drinking was great. Some hoppy IPA. Had sushi yesterday. That also was mighty fine.
Work is always nonsense.
|< Domestic news | Life's little surprises are not always pleasant >|