Print Story "Forward" he cried, from the rear
Diary
By TheophileEscargot (Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 02:23:28 PM EST) Reading, Watching, Museums, Me, MLP (all tags)
Reading: "Dragon's Egg". Watching: "Micmacs". Museums. Me. Web.


What I'm Reading
Finally got around to hard-SF classic Dragon's Egg by Robert L. Forward. Has a bit of a back-handed compliment on the cover: "This is one for the real science-fiction fan"- Frank Herbert. It's archetypal hard SF: brilliantly explored scientific ideas, hopelessly terrible characters and dialogue:
Her skirt, blouse and clogs were her only items of clothing. It was not that she did not own stockings -- and purses -- and makeup -- and rings -- and perfume -- and other "women's things;" it was just that she was in too much of a hurry that morning to bother with them, for she had work to do. The French government had not given her a state fellowship to study at the International Space Institute so she could spend all morning getting dressed.
Found it a bit hard to get into at first, but once the human scientists arrive at the neutron star the old sensawunda kicked in. There are intelligent lifeforms on the surface, composed of nuclear matter (no electron belt-clouds or molecules) and their way of living is the focus of the book.

Overall, enjoyed it a lot. Not for the faint-hearted though.

What I'm Watching
Saw Micmacs at the cinema. Latest film by Jean-Pierre Jeunet who also did Amelie and Delicatessen.

Not a bad film: as you'd expect has a full complement of eccentric characters. Did find my attention wavering at times though: could have done with a bit more narrative drive.

The plot concerns the hero getting revenge on arms manufacturers whose products have done him harm, so might be more appealing to someone more pacifistic than me. Oddly, there's a somewhat sympathetic portrait of one of the factory workers. Not sure if we're supposed to ponder the ethical ambiguity of the heroes throwing all the factory workers out of their jobs, or if we're not expected to think that far.

Overall: OK, not unmissable.

Exhibitions
Saw the Paul Nash exhibition at the Dulwich Picture Gallery.

Bit disappointed. He's mostly famous for one painting: "Totes Meer", a sea of scrapped bombers. However, a lot of his other output seems to be fairly scrappy landscapes which didn't seem that interesting to me. There are a few atmospheric drawings though, some of them with a kind of calm equilibrium.

Took nebbish's advice and got the bus this time: much easier than the allegedly faster but hopelessly unreliable train system.

Me: driving
Considering starting driving again. Won't buy a car but might try one of these car club things like City Car Club, Streetcar or Zipcar. They're just rentals, but you book online, get in with a smartcard, and they're parked all over town. Streetcar has about five car within half a mile of me, mostly Golfs; City Car Club has fewer, mostly Corsas, but one's an automatic.

Have booked a refresher driving lesson for Saturday morning. Haven't driven in 9 or 10 years. Haven't driven a manual in closer to 20. If I kangaroo-hop too much might join City Car Club, otherwise Streetcar seems to have a better choice.

Not sure if I'll actually use it though: in London the Tube's faster for most destinations and minicabs aren't much more expensive. Could be handy if my Dad's health takes a bad turn though and I need to get up North in a hurry, or help run shifts to the hospital.

Passed the practice theory tests with 46/50 and 49/50 so I still seem to be OK on that front.

Web
3D museum artefacts. Don't over-medicalize stopping smoking.

Politics. Sectarianism undermines far right in Scotland: the hooligan firms haven't united there. Matthew Parris on a hung parliament:

A minority government will be seen as a caretaker until another dissolution of Parliament can be precipitated.

All minds will be cast forward towards that point, and daily politics will be overshadowed by manipulating for moral advantage in the coming second election. The electorate and its news media will be viewed by both partners in government as a kind of marriage-guidance counsellor, in front of whom each party manoeuvres to present itself as the responsible one: the injured party.

Economics. Planning and Finance:
Alas, the same two faults we witnessed with central planning were reproduced in "central markets"... even well-motivated" abstract investors", owners of funds who shuffle claims on a wide variety of enterprises and rely only on accounting data, and not the local and tacit knowledge of those on the scene, cannot really know what actions will make production more efficient at using resources...

Random. Roddenberry's original Star Trek pitch document. T-shirt artist.

< Oh so many places we'll go! | ye olden times >
"Forward" he cried, from the rear | 33 comments (33 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
(Comment Deleted) by xth (4.00 / 1) #1 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 02:31:04 PM EST

This comment has been deleted by xth





The economics of car ownership is weird by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #2 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 02:44:05 PM EST
There are very high fixed costs (depreciation, insurance, road tax, maintenance) but a very low marginal costs. So once you're paying all that you may as well drive as much as you can.

But even in car club I suspect you still don't drive as much as a car owner would, because you're confronted with a high marginal cost every time you decide to drive.

Apparently an average motorist spends £5,539 a year. But if you spent even half that on a car club, it would feel very expensive.
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

(Comment Deleted) by xth (4.00 / 1) #7 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 03:24:28 PM EST

This comment has been deleted by xth



[ Parent ]

I reckon by Herring (4.00 / 1) #26 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 07:42:46 AM EST
if we tried we could do without a second car - even with the total lack of public transport out my way. When we know what secondary school the boy is going to and what the transport options for that are ...

This is not a mistake, this is my act - Stewart Lee
[ Parent ]

That's basically my usage pattern too.. by Metatone (4.00 / 1) #11 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 04:39:51 PM EST
One advantage of Streetcar is you get membership of Streetvan included... which can be quite useful.

It's also good to maintain driving skills for possible holidays where public transport can't get you to where you'd like to go.

But driving in London isn't that much fun, if you get caught in traffic you can lose a lot of time and unless you're going to a big warehouse somewhere on the outskirts parking can be a pain too... so I just don't do it that often...

Also, because my mum and dad live up the East Coast line I'm painfully aware that in the time it can take to make it past the M25 and properly onto a flowing motorway away from London you can be a 100 miles north already on the train...

[ Parent ]

Dragon's Egg by wiredog (4.00 / 1) #3 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 02:44:51 PM EST
I remember getting that one from the library back in high school. Loved it then.

Earth First!
(We can strip mine the rest later.)



Me too by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #4 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 03:00:17 PM EST
It was pretty memorable when it came out.  I must have been in high school.  I remember thinking it was pretty awesome, but never being able to read any of his other works because of the appallingly bad characters/dialog.
---
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman
[ Parent ]

Star Trek by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #5 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 03:13:54 PM EST
That Star Trek proposal is fascinating, especially some of the episode synopses, those that eventually got made, and those that clearly would have been too much for the sixties censors.  It's pretty clear from a couple that Roddenberry wanted to attack racial issues from the beginning.

...it's also clear that Roddenberry was a lot more advanced in issues of race than sex.
---
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman


Best studio interference ever by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #6 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 03:17:33 PM EST
Was getting rid of the character "Number One". I suspect even by the late sixties the Frigid Career Woman stereotype was out-of-date and offensive.
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

...but...but... by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #8 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 03:47:42 PM EST
He had the hot yeoman to balance it out!
---
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman
[ Parent ]

Thinking about it by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #15 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 05:19:58 PM EST
You could write a parallel universe story where there was a Number One but no Mr Spock in Star Trek, leading to a strong ultra-logical scientist role model for girls, leading to a female-dominated scientific establishment and IT industry.
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

Heh by ucblockhead (4.00 / 2) #18 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 06:13:50 PM EST
That could be amusing.

Wild tangent: the female representation in IT has gone steadily down since I went to college, and the best explanation I've seen is how tied it is to videogame culture.
---
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman
[ Parent ]

Smoking stuff by Herring (4.00 / 2) #9 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 03:53:43 PM EST
The huge number of "stop smoking with product X" adverts on at the moment are the one thing that really makes me want a cigarette right now. That and loneliness and depression.

I know nicotine replacement things have never worked for me at all. Too easy to peel the patch off at the end of the day and have a fag.

The Allen Carr thing was all about "Don't smoke. It's not that bad." It's a fair point.

The only medical thing that work(s/ed) for me is Champix - because it makes cigarettes revolting. Doesn't stop you wanting one.

Anyway, I'm off to think about something else.

This is not a mistake, this is my act - Stewart Lee


I agree with all of this. by toxicfur (4.00 / 1) #10 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 04:15:23 PM EST
It's been nearly 3 years now for me, and I still want one from time to time. It's a lot easier now, though, and mostly I don't think about it. If it hadn't been for Chantix/Champix, I think I'd probably still be smoking, though.
--
The amount of suck that you can put up with can be mind-boggling, but it only really hits you when it then ceases to suck. -- Kellnerin
[ Parent ]

Yes by Herring (4.00 / 2) #13 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 04:54:34 PM EST
The thing that got me is that, particularly straight after christmas/new year, there were loads of adverts for NRT products that went "Giving up smoking is hard and ..." "FUCK OFF".

The thing that got/gets me is that when I stop, I tend to plunge into a depression that builds up to a near divorce-level row and then we start all over again. If I can beat the depression through exercise, then it should all be OK. Or at least easier.

This is not a mistake, this is my act - Stewart Lee
[ Parent ]

I started again a few months ago by priestess (2.00 / 0) #28 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 11:57:43 AM EST
I started again a few months ago after being quit for about 3 years. Smoked for a few months, then gave up again a couple of weeks ago.

Like a little smoking holiday. It was nice.

Maybe I'll have another one in a few years.

Quitting smoking is pretty easy, trouble is that starting again is pretty easy too if you ain't careful.

Pre...........
---------
Chat to the virtual me...
[ Parent ]

A huge amount depends... by Metatone (4.00 / 1) #12 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 04:46:58 PM EST
on the actual election result, in detail. Parris' assumption that the Tories have the moral high ground to offer the Lib Dems a shitty deal (particularly on PR) and spin it into a quick second election victory (with majority) all depend on the figures in play. If the Tories "just miss out" then he's right... and Ashcroft's spending in the marginals should make it that way... but I think so far the Tory inability to project an actual sense of what they would do to the public robs them of the ability to claim a mandate if there is a hung parliament... 



Also by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #14 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 05:01:23 PM EST
He's dutifully confident that the Tories would win a quick second election, but I'm not so sure.

First, the polls seem to show a trend of a Labour climb since mid-2009, which might continue.

Second, I think failing to get a majority would present a good opportunity for Labour to dump Gordon Brown, who seems to be at least a minor liability. It would have been insane to try to replace Brown with yet another unelected PM, but a second election gives them a chance to offer up another candidate on the grounds the first has been rejected. David Miliband's pretty shit, but he's not much more smarmily obnoxious than David Cameron, and it'll take the Tories and tabloids a while to rev up significant hatred towards him.
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

Unelected PM? by Tonatiuh (4.00 / 1) #24 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 06:33:49 AM EST
You really don't meant that, do you?

It is funny how Britain seems to be quite proud (rigidly in general terms) about Parliamentary democracy just to whine at every turn about not being able to elect the PM.

I think every person in this country should be forced to apply for citizenship as foreigners looking for a British passport do, then some of the finer points about how this country works would be required knowledge before you can go on holiday to the Costa Brava ....

[ Parent ]

A couple of things by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #29 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 02:46:28 PM EST
First, the usual way to become Prime Minister is to start from opposition, then get elected. It's pretty unusual to get shoved straight in as PM without even going through a leadership election. With an unwritten constitution, tradition is a bigger deal.

Secondly, like it or not (not), Britain has moved towards a more Presidential style of government. These days, elections are presented as between rival leaders, with their wives baking abilities apparently a big issue. There's "sofa government" where the PM makes policy decisions straight from Number Ten via a small clique of advisors, not through Cabinet or ministries. There are hundreds of political appointees within the Civil Service owing direct loyalty to the PM or his party.

So, it's not just through watching too much US TV that people expect British elections to be like Presidential elections, it's basic fairness. If a PM enjoys Presidential-style personal power, unrestrained by the Cabinet or the Civil Service; it seems pretty reasonable that he should be subject to Presidential-style personal approval by the voters.
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

Tradition? by Tonatiuh (2.00 / 0) #31 Fri Mar 19, 2010 at 10:11:04 PM EST
Tradition may matter as an ethical point of reference, but it is no basis for a legal procedure, unless it becomes codified in law as such (and as even staunch defenders of the British Constitutional Monarchy system have noted, this increases the urgency of dropping the unwritten constitution nonsense and put everything in black an white in a piece of paper).

The belief of the British populace in tradition (and another one, self regulation) is touching, but probing ineffective as recent shenanigans in Westminster show (I find bizarre that in this day and age politicians find perfectly legitimate to hire a family member to work for them,  in other places that is corruption and has a name: nepotism, people go to jail for doing it, it is amusing to watch the British political class figuring those things out so late in the game of modern democratic practice).

As for "sofa government" you simply can't avoid it, no matter how you elect one leader, he will have the ability to decide who his advisers are, it is happening to Obama for example, the "eminence gris" phenomenon is unavoidable.

[ Parent ]

Zipcar are a bunch of wankers by Dr Thrustgood (4.00 / 1) #16 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 05:32:36 PM EST
That said, they do have the most fun cars out of the lot. I haven't forgiven them for making me think that a BMW Mini Cooper is an acceptable car for a man. Even with a manual six-speed gearbox.

On the other hand, do you want to be a member of a car club where you can be accused of damaging one of their cars several months after hiring it, then spend a week arguing over email (lots of lovely suggestions to pay up now so they don't have to contact the poor fucker who previously hired the car), only for them to go quiet and never receive a "It's alright, some other fella's coughed to it"-type email.

It's really a difficult balancing act, I mean six-speed mini cooper lulz! C'mon!





Cheers by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #17 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 05:37:15 PM EST
Will stay away from them... they don't have so many cars near me anyway.
--
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]

I like them by ad hoc (4.00 / 1) #20 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 10:03:59 PM EST
I've used them for 10 years with no problem. Plus, your membership is valid in any city you visit.
--
[ Parent ]

(Comment Deleted) by xth (4.00 / 1) #19 Tue Mar 16, 2010 at 07:17:00 PM EST

This comment has been deleted by xth



[ Parent ]

Just remembered by Dr Thrustgood (4.00 / 1) #22 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 06:00:54 AM EST
They did that overnight special where you paid something like £20 to hire a car from 6pm until 8:30 the next morning.

It's a good idea, so I visit my sister and her family, get up early in the morning and drive back to London. Massive bastard traffic, so I extend the booking by 30 minutes and get the bloody thing back on time.

Get charged £45-odd quid, as that extra 30 minutes meant the overnight wotsit no longer applies, so they charge you full rate for the entirety. No exceptions, no "Oh thanks for letting us know," just a generic "Sorry, you're fucked, bye!" email.

It's the minor cuntishness like that which put me off them.



[ Parent ]

Paul Nash by nebbish (4.00 / 1) #21 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 04:26:11 AM EST
Is a subtle surrealist. His landscapes echo dreams like Dali's do but in a much more understated way. He's one of my favourite artists but I'll be the first to admit he takes a bit of getting into, I used to find him a bit dull too.

There's a bit of perversity in me liking him as well, Britain didn't really get surrealism and there is something slightly comical about his dour, very British attempts at it.

--------
It's political correctness gone mad!


Hung Parliament, minority governments. by Tonatiuh (4.00 / 1) #23 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 06:28:50 AM EST
I am really fed up with the British media and commentators regarding this matter, by hearing to them you would think that the UK is the first country ever to suffer the indignity of having to provide governance in accordance to the wishes of the voting public.

Do the journos in Fleet St, the Isle of Dogs, Broadcasting House et all actually have heard about this country, what is its name?, er.. Oh yeah. Scotland....

And Germany, and Italy, and Israel, and Spain (the autonomic provincial coalition governments there make any arrangements that may be needed in the UK seen like child's play).

Gee... they shuld really grow up.



(Comment Deleted) by xth (4.00 / 2) #25 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 06:54:22 AM EST

This comment has been deleted by xth



[ Parent ]

how about by Merekat (4.00 / 1) #27 Wed Mar 17, 2010 at 10:27:33 AM EST
The Swiss magic formula?
Always the same govt., but different.


[ Parent ]

I was not talking about stability by Tonatiuh (2.00 / 0) #30 Fri Mar 19, 2010 at 09:53:46 PM EST
I was talking about normal governability.

Both countries function perfectly fine all things considered.

You can't shoehorn stability in the political landscape if the electorate is telling the political class they don't want stability.

[ Parent ]

(Comment Deleted) by xth (2.00 / 0) #32 Sat Mar 20, 2010 at 06:01:44 AM EST

This comment has been deleted by xth



[ Parent ]

But that would refelct the wishes of the people by Tonatiuh (2.00 / 0) #33 Mon Mar 22, 2010 at 08:18:23 AM EST
A system like the current one, where a party with 33% of the votes (less than 20% of the total electorate) can command a majority is clearly wrong.

[ Parent ]

"Forward" he cried, from the rear | 33 comments (33 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback