Print Story I never expected to be defeated by a cup of tea
Diary
By TheophileEscargot (Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 08:40:54 AM EST) (all tags)
Reading: "The Good Terrorist". Watching: "Red Cliff", "Death Race". ODGF. Web.


What I'm Reading
Finished The Good Terrorist by Doris Lessing. Set in London in the Eighties, a group of young communists move into a squat and start preparing for terrorism. Told from the point of view of Alice, a seemingly competent but unstable woman who acts as a surrogate mother for the group.

This time, Lessing reminds me a little bit of John Updike in the fascinating details of setting up the house, how to clear a concreted-up toilet bowl, and the claustrophobic relationships between the characters.

Acutely observed. A compelling read despite the lack of action, as the tension builds, and the consquences of Alice's actions unfold.

Seems to have become a minor classic: well worth reading.

Revisited review.

ODGF
Odd. Felt like I'd was getting wobblier around the middle, as usually happens after a while without a weigh-in, and was psyching up for a couple of weeks of dieting, but according to the scales I haven't put on weight. Hmmm.

Weight 27 Mar 2009

What I'm Watching
Saw John Woo's Chinese historical epic Red Cliff at the cinema. Fun movie despite its length: great battle scenes, swashbuckling derring-do and inspiring speeches, which I'm going to assume are less cheesy in the original. Definitely worth seeing, deserves the big screen too.

Apparently there's a sequel too: will have to look out for that.

What I'm Watching 2
Saw action movie remake Death Race on DVD. Annoyed that I missed this at the cinema now. My big complaint about modern action movies is the weightless and unrealistic CGI. Death Race makes a point of doing old-school real world stunts, including a superb armoured truck crash that I've never seen before.

As well as classic stunts has a fast and silly plot. Unmissable if you like action movies.

Annoyed at the way mainstream reviewers never tell you whether an action movie has good action scenes or not: just giving uniformly bad reviews to everything.

Web
Pics. Space alphabet. World War III propaganda posters. Pink gundam. Tattoo locations diagram.

Video. Stupid but funny: Boing, extreme rice, crashes with Team Fortress sound effects. Trailer for cat ladies documentary. 5 seconds: Irresponsible Tio. Grey Bloke on Christianity again. Eagle buzzes model plane.

Sociology. Talibe beggars of Senegal.Parents keep child's sex a secret (MeFi). Is migration responsible for Europe's turn to right-wing? Rowntree report on inequality, (Full PDF) Guardian, Times:

All parties assume that the financial crisis has focused people's fury on the unjustified salaries paid to the very rich; that the recession will mean there's much more sympathy for the unemployed; and that there is a new concern about bridging the gap between the top and bottom...

Well, it's not so. Rowntree's research, among more than 1,000 adults of all income groups, shows that more than two thirds of them admire the rich, and assume that their high salaries are a proper reward for ability, effort and performance. On the other hand, they are largely contemptuous of the poor, especially those who live on benefits. Those people are routinely described as scroungers.

The research group are sublimely unconcerned about social mobility, because they think it exists. It's now harder to move class in Britain than in any other developed country except the United States, and yet 69% believe that there are enough opportunities for anyone to get on in life if they really want to. And though most people described themselves as very concerned about inequality, it wasn't the gap between rich and poor they cared about. It was the gap between the top and themselves that they wanted to see narrowed.

Economics. Is the ECB taking bigger risks than the Fed and the Bank of England? Proposal: incentive accounts for executive pay:
Existing schemes have two main problems. First, stock and options typically have short vesting periods, allowing executives to "cash out" early... This encourages managers to pump up the short-term stock price at the expense of long-run value... because they can liquidate their holdings before the long-run damage appears.
...
Second, current schemes fail to keep pace with a firm's changing conditions. If a company's stock price plummets, stock options are close to worthless and have little incentive effect -- precisely at the time when managerial effort is particularly critical.
Sci/Tech. Twitter's twarchitecture. Is dolphin-safe tuna an ecological disaster? Gulls attack whales.

Misc. UK restaurant chain clamps down on cash tips. Interview with capybara owner. History: Treasure hunt riots (MeFi). Artist tries to make toaster from scratch, angers libertarians (MeFi).

< summery summary | Bad Times >
I never expected to be defeated by a cup of tea | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
libertarian anger is the funniest anger -nt- by clover kicker (4.00 / 3) #1 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 09:00:11 AM EST




I approve of the metafilter - filter. by garlic (4.00 / 1) #2 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 10:29:03 AM EST

Suck it


Incentives and boni by Herring (4.00 / 2) #3 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 10:47:59 AM EST
A lot of people make the snarky remark about how massive boni encourage the top people but aren't ever offered to the plebs to make them work harder. I thought about this and I reckon there is a point - if someone gave me a £25m bonus, they would never see me again. Only these evil plutocrats are motivated to come back for more when they already have so much.

So, in other words, massive bonuses wouldn't motivate the ordinary worker.



Maybe if you got rich suddenly by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #4 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 12:37:28 PM EST
But the theory of hedonic adaptation suggests that if you gradually got richer and richer you'd adapt to it and become greedy for more.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

I bet I wouldn't by ad hoc (4.00 / 2) #5 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 03:00:54 PM EST
and I invite you to prove me wrong.
--
[ Parent ]

a quick check by garlic (4.00 / 1) #13 Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 10:24:33 AM EST
shows that I'm making 15k more than 3 years ago, but the amount going into my personal account is approximately the same. I'm definately saving more than 3 years ago however. It'd be a little harder to check my expenses account against this, I can think of no expense changes, but that could just imply adaption to those expenses.

Suck it
[ Parent ]

Classic error in the LIbertarian article by Herring (4.00 / 3) #6 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 03:21:12 PM EST
As for "pre-toaster" lives, most people who lived in the age before the toaster could expect to die by about age 40 (the toaster was invented in 1893, when life expectancy in the U.S. was about 43 years).

People often think this - because the "average life expectancy" in the year (whatever) was 40 or 35 or something/ Well, yes that's the mean age (and interestingly health was generally better before the industrial recolution than during). In those days, if you made it past the age of 2, likely you'd gone on for a long while. Women who made it past childbirth could live to 60 or 70. Actually, contraception probably made more difference to "mean life expectancy" than anything else.

Not sure there was a point to this post, but there you are.



Scale by gpig (4.00 / 1) #7 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 05:03:34 PM EST
I'd suggest you don't need the y-axis on your weight graph to go all the way to 0, unless you're planning something really drastic ....
---
(,   ,') -- eep
"This option is deprecated, as it is conceptually flawed." -- man psql


Plan for the long-term [n/t] by Herring (4.00 / 5) #8 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 05:15:26 PM EST


[ Parent ]

I tried that by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #9 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 06:27:40 PM EST
But some kept going "OMG massive weight fluctuations". And the resolution of the scales doesn't really make it worth amplifying.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

Indeed by gpig (4.00 / 1) #10 Mon Jun 29, 2009 at 09:46:28 PM EST
I realised after I wrote that comment that this was actually unnecessary pedantry, brought on by the fact that a lot of my day job is producing scientific visualisations ....
---
(,   ,') -- eep
"This option is deprecated, as it is conceptually flawed." -- man psql
[ Parent ]

Action movie. by Tonatiuh (4.00 / 1) #11 Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 07:09:46 AM EST
Movie!

No plot, no development, no acting but good action? The last thing any critic worth his name should check is the action sequences. The action sequences should be an aid to move along the plot, not an end on themselves. Even in  action movies (or perhaps even more so).




Well by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #12 Tue Jun 30, 2009 at 08:28:48 AM EST
They can talk about that stuff too if they want. But potential viewers of Death Race aren't likely to be looking for subtle character development: we want to know whether the action in the action movie is any good.

Besides, subtle character development really belongs on the stage or small screen. Movies are primarily for blowing shit up.
--
Butch and Petey are harsh and unforgiving in their estimation of female beauty.
[ Parent ]

He, you haven't watched Ingmar Bergman.... by Tonatiuh (2.00 / 0) #14 Wed Jul 01, 2009 at 07:05:13 PM EST
Oh wait, you probably have...

If you just want to see things being blown up to bits you don't need a film critic to pasteurize the experience for you.


[ Parent ]

As it happens by Scrymarch (2.00 / 0) #15 Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 10:24:03 AM EST
I finished Romance of the Three Kingdoms this year ... wish I had read it ten or fifteen years ago now ...

Haven't caught the recent movies yet. As I recall the chapters around Red Cliff don't have much in the way of speeches. There is a bit later where Zhuge Liang reviles someone to death though.

The Political Science Department of the University of Woolloomooloo



I never expected to be defeated by a cup of tea | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback