Print Story "Death via the Railways - Blue Lights to the Rescue?"
Death
By lylehsaxon (Sat Nov 14, 2009 at 05:23:06 AM EST) (all tags)
For suicide in San Francisco, people head to the Golden Gate Bridge.  For suicide in Tokyo, people head to the railways....


Suicide is not uncommon in Japan, and has historically been considered an honorable exit when no other paths appear to be forthcoming.  And in modern times, people who commit suicide not uncommonly will do so by jumping in front of a train, typically at the head of the platform as the train comes in at speed.  Some train lines are more popular for doing this than others - the Chuo Line is famous in Tokyo for having a large number of suicides.  Naturally, since the people who successfully commit suicide cannot be consulted as to why they did it, or why they chose a particular place, it's left for the living to ponder.

Why the Chuo Line?

The Chuo Line was - for decades - a deep orange color, what some semi-color-blind people refer to as red, but everyone (except some flat-out color-blind people) agree is a warm color.  One fine day, I was talking with someone and (naturally), the topic of the Chuo Line's high suicide rate came up.  I looked on as though watching a science fiction movie as I was told there's a theory that the reason a lot of people choose to die by jumping in front of the Chuo Line is because it's a shade of red!

I blinked a couple of times, looked into unblinking eyes, and asked if they were serious.  They were.  Then, to test the idea, I asked several other people over a couple of years and was disappointed/distressed to find a majority of people submitting to this theory, saying they had heard (and apparently believed) that it was an aggressive color that prompted people to jump in front of the train!  So I tried acting out the scenario in front of a few believers of this theory by saying (with words, facial expressions, and gestures): "Hum-dee-dum... Ah!  Here comes the train....  Look at that color!  Such aggression!  ......  All right!  That's it!  Time to die!".

I mean... come on!  Does that make sense to you?  It does?  I still don't get it....

Anyway!  They have replaced the deep-orange trains with white/silver/orange trains that are (from the front) just silver and white... and still people are committing suicide by jumping in front of the Chuo Line.  Suddenly you don't hear about the warm color theory as to why people are choosing the ultimate exit via the Chuo Line.

But wait!  The theory lives!  JR Railways has installed squares of blue light (beaming down from overhead) at the end of all the platforms on the central Yamanote loop line.  Why?  Because blue is a calming color and they think it may make people thinking of committing suicide calm down and change their minds....

Now, back to the Chuo Line.  Let's look at a couple of other possibilities.  The Chuo Line has, on an average basis over the course of a full day, the most crowded trains in all of Japan.  So - if there are a given percentage of train riders on any given line that eventually commit suicide by jumping in front of a train, gee, you might actually have more suicides on the most crowded line!  Rocket Science!  And if the conditions on the most crowded line in the country are the most unpleasant, then, gee, maybe some people get seriously depressed about becoming canned sardines for two or three hours every day and decide they can't take it any more, so they take the jump.

Just why is it that no logical reasons are discussed, and everyone latches onto the nonsense about the color of the train being the reason?  From the railway's perspective this is convenient, because if the reason people are committing suicide is because of overcrowding on the line, then they could face potential legal responsibility for creating a cause of the death by not (somehow) providing more trains and alleviating the crowding somewhat.  Mind you, I'm not suggesting negligence on the part of the train system here, either the Chuo Line specifically or the whole rail system in general.  It's an excellent system and it's amazing it functions as well as it does with the 30,000,000 people living in Tokyo.

But here's the thing.  I used to work at a PR agency and I've seen a little how something is put into the media, broadcast, and then accepted by people because they saw it on television.  PR agencies identify "Opinion Leaders" and other sources of public thinking and try to influence them.  Who knows, it might even be some scientific thing about deep orange that actually does lead to suicide, but either way, from the railway's standpoint, it's vastly better if people are discussing the issue as though it were a natural phenomenon rather than a human-made cause.  If it's just a natural phenomenon, then people will not ask them to do something (and anyway, it looks as though they have done something now by changing the color of the trains), but if it's based on conditions (far more likely!), then people will begin clamoring for them to do something.

Anyway - it'll be interesting to see what becomes of the blue lights on the Yamanote Line.  The platforms are so brightly lit with white florescent tubes that the blue is only in that one small spot right at the end of the platform, but maybe some people bent on self-destruction will actually change their minds as they enter the blue light....

Lyle (Hiroshi) Saxon
http://www5d.biglobe.ne.jp/~LLLtrs/
http://uk.youtube.com/lylehsaxon

< The Short Attention-Spanned Clavier | Weekend Update >
"Death via the Railways - Blue Lights to the Rescue?" | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Is the jumping happening at the platforms? by lm (2.00 / 0) #1 Sat Nov 14, 2009 at 07:04:02 AM EST
The local Metro instituted a rule where every train has to stop before pulling up to the load platform in order to reduce `incidents'

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic


Where is that? by lylehsaxon (2.00 / 0) #3 Sun Nov 15, 2009 at 02:55:15 AM EST
Where is that?  That would cut down on people using the trains for the ultimate express check-out, but it would also really slow the system down!  The Yamanote Line in the morning here runs one 11-car train (and these are large train cars too, not small subway cars) every two or three minutes in the morning.  If they had to stop it before the platform, they'd have to reduce the number of trains, because they couldn't possibly run the number they do now if they had to do that.

Where on the globe are you?  How long have they been doing that?

Lyle


The shortest way home is the longest way 'round....
[ Parent ]

Washington DC by lm (2.00 / 0) #5 Sun Nov 15, 2009 at 06:29:33 AM EST
They've been doing it since this past summer when incidents of suicide by train spiked after the big train wreck. And, yes, it does slow things down but not all that much.

Of course, the volume on the DC Metro probably isn't in the same order of magnitude.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Interesting by gpig (2.00 / 0) #6 Sun Nov 15, 2009 at 09:57:16 AM EST
I just assumed it was a safety measure after the Fort Totten accident, since it started around the same time.
---
(,   ,') -- eep
"This option is deprecated, as it is conceptually flawed." -- man psql
[ Parent ]

It started a week after the Fort Totten wreck by lm (2.00 / 0) #13 Mon Nov 16, 2009 at 05:27:22 PM EST
The day after someone jumped in front of a train. I recall a the reason being in the news (whether on WAMU radio or in the paper I cannot recall) but fifteen minutes of searching didn't bring up anything relevant so it may very well be that I'm misremembering.

That said, I was paying pretty close attention because (a) fort totten is two stops down from my house and (b) that's the train I ride between school and home.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

A of B I would think.... by lylehsaxon (2.00 / 0) #14 Sun Nov 29, 2009 at 12:22:05 AM EST
I would think stopping the trains once before they come into the platform would be an anti-suicide measure more than a general safety precaution.  Actually, it's probably just the living's aversion to words of death like "suicide" that leads to terms like "passenger action" "jishin-jiko" (Japanese for "passenger action") and that wonderful all-purpose "safety precaution".  Assuming the "safety" part of that refers to keeping someone alive, "safety precaution" could probably be translated as "anti-suicide measure"? - LHS

The shortest way home is the longest way 'round....
[ Parent ]

Maybe a worldwide thing then...? by lylehsaxon (2.00 / 0) #9 Mon Nov 16, 2009 at 08:19:34 AM EST
I had gotten used to thinking that express checkout via the rails was a Japanese phenomenon, but it's fairly common in the world (anywhere with commuter lines)?

Lyle


The shortest way home is the longest way 'round....
[ Parent ]

right. by aphrael (2.00 / 0) #10 Mon Nov 16, 2009 at 09:32:26 AM EST
the commuter line between SF and San Jose gets 5-6 of these a year.
If television is a babysitter, the internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up.
[ Parent ]

Natsukashii! by lylehsaxon (2.00 / 0) #11 Mon Nov 16, 2009 at 04:28:36 PM EST
I used to use that line on weekends to visit Sunnyvale (where I used to live), when I lived in San Francisco (1982-84).  They still had some of the old cars that looked like they'd been in use since the 1930's or something. 

Lyle

The shortest way home is the longest way 'round....
[ Parent ]

Well, by `spike', they mean they've doubled . . . by lm (2.00 / 0) #12 Mon Nov 16, 2009 at 05:25:02 PM EST
. . . last years total which was in the single digits the DC metropolitan area. This year will probably hit double digits. I don't know if the per capita numbers work out to be comparable or if the percentage of all suicide numbers work out to be comparable. (DC proper has 700k or so inhabitants. I wouldn't really want to guess the total populations of all the areas serviced by the Metro.)

I suspect the attraction to those seriously intent on suicide is like the attraction of firearms. It's pretty close to certainty once you make the leap or pull the trigger.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

30,000,000 in Metropolitan Tokyo by lylehsaxon (2.00 / 0) #15 Sun Nov 29, 2009 at 12:25:59 AM EST
I guess only a tiny percentage of the 30,000,000 people in the greater Tokyo area have to choose express checkout via the rails to make for a fairly large number of incidents.... - LHS

The shortest way home is the longest way 'round....
[ Parent ]

I would guess by ad hoc (2.00 / 0) #2 Sat Nov 14, 2009 at 08:44:26 AM EST
a) areas on that line are more easily accessible (similar to your "most crowded")

b) popularity (That line works for every one else, I'll go there)

I mean, it's the same with bridges. Why choose Golden Gate over some other bridge? Because you're more likely to succeed there and it's popular.
--


Accessiblity... by lylehsaxon (2.00 / 0) #4 Sun Nov 15, 2009 at 03:04:45 AM EST
There are some new subway lines that have a wall on the edge of the platform, and then double doors that open when the train stops (platform doors and train doors).  With those lines, they've definitely made the rails very difficult (nearly or actually impossible in some cases) to access.

On the vast majority of lines though, the rails are equally accessible, with the caveat that on less crowded lines, someone hanging around the end of the platform would be more likely to draw attention from someone than on a very crowded platform where the whole platform is full of people.

In the Golden Gate Bridge's case, from what I understand, it's far easier to get over the side than on just about any other bridge in the country.  If it were owned by the state, they would probably have put up high fences a long time ago, but it's privately owned, and the reasoning is that San Francisco is a tourist location and they don't want to ruin the view for the sight-seers who walk over the bridge.

Once it's on the news - then that could draw people to it....  That's a good question actually - but if the people jumping in front of the train are the same people who have been using that line, then it's just their line.

Lyle


The shortest way home is the longest way 'round....
[ Parent ]

untrue. by aphrael (2.00 / 0) #7 Sun Nov 15, 2009 at 10:34:46 PM EST
the golden gate bridge is not privately owned.

it's owned by the Golden Gate Transportation District, a subdivision of California created expressly for the purpose of maintaining and operating the bridge. Its powers are laid out in California Streets + Highways Code 27550 et seq.. Its board of directors consists of appointees from the six counties which form the district, as laid out in CA SH Code 27510.
If television is a babysitter, the internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up.
[ Parent ]

Oops.... by lylehsaxon (2.00 / 0) #8 Mon Nov 16, 2009 at 08:17:05 AM EST
I knew there was something independent-ish about it compared to other bridges in California, and then made the leap to think it was privately owned.  I should have researched that first!

Thanks for the correction!

Lyle


The shortest way home is the longest way 'round....
[ Parent ]

"Death via the Railways - Blue Lights to the Rescue?" | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback