Print Story Beware the ideas of March
Diary
By lm (Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 10:42:40 AM EST) (all tags)
In which the diary author looks over the events of this past week to reveal that not much has happened.


I've got answers back from all of the grad schools I've applied to except for one. Thus far I've been accepted by one, rejected by three and wait listed by one. I don't know what the hold up is for the last one. But, being a classics program, it's rather a long shot for a bloke like me who has only the equivalent of 1 year of Latin and 2 and half years of Greek. That said, if I can get in and if I can excel, my academic history will be much more alluring bait for all the rock star Ph.D. programs that have rejected me this time around.

On the other hand, one acceptance letter is sufficient for my purposes provided that the powers that be make the right decisions on funding. I'm still waiting to hear back on funding from the school that accepted me.

I'm presently writing a bit inspired by Yo-Yo Ma's commentary for This I Believe. I'm not certain that I'm taking it in the direction he intended, using him as an epitome of the medieval Islamic understanding of a philosopher-king. Should be up on doxos on Sunday evening or Monday morning. What makes this different than other pieces inspired by events in the news or commentaries, is that I'm not inspired by being ((spoiled torqued)) off by the utter idiocy of what I heard. Rather, I was very appreciative of Ma's point of view. It's a nice commentary and well worth listening to.

If you didn't follow the link in bo's celliary to the Salon interview with Chris Hedges, author of `I Don't Believe in Atheists', you should if for no other reason than to see these to quotes in their full glory.

On having sympathy for jihadists:

I spent so long in war zones that I think we don't know what we would do under repression and abuse -- you know, if somebody killed my father. That's the brilliance of the great writers on the Holocaust, like Primo Levi and [Bruno] Bettelheim. They understood the humanity of their own killers. That line between the victim and the victimizer is razor-thin. We all carry within us the capacity for abuse, and I think that's the most disturbing lesson you walk away with when you cover wars. We're all capable of evil, under the right circumstances, and very few of us are immune.

On the intellectual approach of Christopher Hitchens:

That kind of stuff is just ... it's the epistemology of television.

I think it clear that the `epistemology of television' needs to have a full blown treatment, even if not in the fashion that Hedges uses the phrase.

At work I dodged a major bullet. Or rather, I triumphed over software that is far more difficult to install than it ought to be. The software is on a laptop to which several Pocket PC devices will be connecting. It's set to go out to a trade show on Monday morning. Had I not finally overcome yesterday, I'd working on that all weekend instead of sitting around in my boxers writing things like this diary entry and pontificating on Yo-Yo Ma and Abu Nasr al-Farabi.

I also scheduled a closing to officially sell the last house I own that I don't live in, the Headache House. This is the first house my wife and I bought the year after our daughter was born. Little did we know that Dayton, Ohio was about to enter into a death spiral. When we moved down to Cincinnati, we couldn't afford to fix the things that were required to be fixed in order to sell it for what we owed the bank. Ten years later, and tens of thousands of dollars sunk into it, we're selling it on paper for about 2k less than we bought it for. But we're also owner financing. After over five years of alternating between renting it out and trying to sell it, we've finally accepted that no one who qualifies for a traditional mortgage is going to have any interest in buying it. So we've offered a private mortgage to the present renters who have been paying on time every month for about 6 months. If all turns out well, in ten years, they'll own the house completely unencumbered. But at the very least, my wife and I will no longer be on the hook for property taxes and utilities nor  will we have any liability if it goes vacant and turns into a squat.

Despite this being the first week of Lent and despite me holding to the fast (no meat, no fish, no dairy, no wine) and being hungry all the time, my weight is the same as last week. The odd thing is that my waist is smaller. I can comfortably wear my belt tightened one more notch than I could last week. I'd say that maybe I lost fat and gained muscle, but I didn't exercise at all this week. I was so sore from shoveling snow on the weekend that I skipped my morning exercise routine for the first half of the week and by the last half I was just plain too lazy.

Being the first week of Lent, my evenings were full of the Church services. Monday through Thursday were parts 1 through 4 of the Repentance Canon of Saint Andrew of Crete. I missed only Thursday, needing to get my last Latin homework assignment completed before Friday morning. It's a beautifully solemn service that highlights the many wrongs committed by various figures in the Old and New Testaments followed and the subsequent repentance of those figures. No matter how grievous the sin, there is always the possibility of repentance. Friday was a the Lenten vesperal liturgy of Saint Gregory the Great which is also very solemn and heartbreakingly beautiful.

And now on to seize the day.

< Attention London infidels... | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Beware the ideas of March | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Geographical identity? No thanks! by Alan Crowe (4.00 / 1) #1 Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 03:10:59 PM EST

I thought it odd of Yo-Yo Ma to even consider accepting a geographical identity. Who am I? In descending order: a mathematician, a Lisp programmer and furry (defparameter *fur-name* 'felis-parenthesis), a Buddhist, a pianist, an engineer, British, Go player, barefooter,...

My geographical allegiance has to come in the list somewhere, but I've placed it too high, because the order becomes hard to discern and there is little point running on. There is something terribly limiting about a geographical identity. It reminds me of blacks who limit themselves by confining themselves to black role models or women who limit themselves by confining themselves to female role models. Why would any-one want to risk trapping themselves in a head space that says "I cannot do that because there is no Chinese role-model"?





Well... by ammoniacal (4.00 / 1) #2 Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 03:48:30 PM EST
Black people who choose non-black role models get opportunities to deal with the lovely baggage of being called "Uncle Tom," a "Sell-out," and if they're really lucky, "race traitor."

Do women catch this kind of crap from other women when they choose male role models? I doubt it.

PMSbuddy.com -- Saving relationships, one month at a time!
[ Parent ]

and Coconut by Alan Crowe (4.00 / 1) #4 Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 06:06:32 PM EST
Black on the outside, but white inside.

I get that Blacks face special problems. I expect franco-american Chinese to see the problems that Blacks have and to see that people who try to chose a limiting identity for you are not your friends.

Aha! I think I see what is going on. I see myself as human, rather than Chinese or Scottish or Black. Just human from muzzle to tail :-) So I'm not seeing why a chinese would fail to empathize with a Black and draw the appropriate parallel lesson for his own life. But it is coming into focus, once you buy into limiting identity X, the fact that limiting identity Y harmed "y" doesn't provide you with a clue. "y" is a Y, the other, nothing to learn there! 

[ Parent ]

Also by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #8 Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 04:27:32 PM EST
Oreo.

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
[ Parent ]

Geographical? by lm (4.00 / 1) #3 Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 04:37:09 PM EST
Odd. My understanding of his commentary is that he was speaking of ethnicity and culture more than geography. That his parents were born in China, for example, being less important that growing up in house where there were Chinese traditions.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Eclectic versus off-the-peg by Alan Crowe (2.00 / 0) #5 Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 06:21:56 PM EST
You are right, "geographical" is the wrong adjective. I'm trying to get at the package-deal aspect of identities such as French, American, Chinese.

For example, if you brought a Chinese respect for ancient wisdom to America you could read the Federalist papers and adopt Hamilton and Jefferson as revered sages. So there is a fertility in unwrapping the packages and trying to mix and match.

[ Parent ]

And that's exactly what Ma's point was by lm (2.00 / 0) #9 Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 08:42:03 AM EST
One's cultural identity doesn't have to be exclusive.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

It's a tricky thing though. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 2) #7 Sun Mar 16, 2008 at 08:06:49 AM EST
I'm inclined to agree with you, but how much of that is due to the fact that I grew up in the majority population of an economically well of first-world democracy?

Would I be so general if I were born, say, in a third-world war-torn country and my survival depended on my identification with an ethnic?

Even if I made that choice, if everybody around me was making life and death decisions based on ethnic identities, would it make a difference what I though about the issue. Getting killed because one is identified as an X type of person may have as much to do with other people's decisions about you than your own self-identification.

I think the general strategy really only works for people who are never going to be put in a position where their identification is never put to the test, either because of decisions the person makes or decisions somebody will make about them.

In your case, during the Cambodian revolution, intellectuals and educated people were rounded up. Many pretended to be un-educated and illiterate for fear they'd be killed for not fitting the government's new idea of a nation of simple, honest farmers. Would the force and resources of being a mathematician be so essential that you would have died rather than renounce it?

Would I stand by my Christianity if, someday, Dawkins got his way and all believers were treated like mental cases?

Who knows? It seems unlikely. I suspect we wear these identities so lightly because they come so easy. It's a decision that doesn't matter for us, so the decision seems weird when others have to make it or have it forced on them.

[ Parent ]

What happens after the danger has passed? by Alan Crowe (2.00 / 0) #11 Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 06:11:37 PM EST
... and my survival depended on my identification with an ethnic?

Let us suppose that you have taken on the protective colouration required by circumstances. You survive. Time passes. Now what? I see several possibilities.

  1. The identity seeps into your bones. Eventually your are one of the older guys enforcing adoption of the indentity. You become one of the bad guys who forced the identity on you many years before.
  2. Cynicism in the ancient greek sense: There is no truth and when a path opens to a more advantageous identity you walk it. Perhaps you appear at a press conference, tearfully confessing the error of your old ways, but if it is convincing it is because you have practised infront of a mirror. You know that both identities are social conventions to be adopted to keep out of trouble.
  3. Grudge bearing. You watch and you wait. When those who forced your submission grow weak or careless you stab them in the back.
  4. Semi-permeability: Under pressure of compulsion the forced indentity seeps into you bones. Absent the pressure it slowly seeps out again. This seems to be the Yo-Yo Ma position. A package-deal identity is not a good idea, and free from serious pressure he notices this and mentions it to others.
  5. Moral specialisation: You notice how painful it is to be forced. When the danger is passed you shed the forced identity, but you do not forget. You don't force that particular package-deal identity on any-one else, and try to stop others from forcing it on others.
  6. Moral generalisation: You notice how painful it is to be forced. When the danger is passed you shed the forced identity, but you do not forget. You don't force any package-deal identity on any-one else, and try to stop others from forcing their different package-deal indentities on others.
Perhaps 4 is best, 5 and 6 offer both the pleasures and the dangers of righteous indigation. I'm not happy with my analysis. My gut feeling is that 1 is really bad, one should take a stand against it, and that involves taking a firmer stand against package-deal identities than Yo-yo Ma does.

[ Parent ]

There are some other possibilities. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (2.00 / 0) #12 Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 07:03:17 PM EST
7. Your package identity becomes an intellectual and moral norm and you can no longer even understand that it isn't, in fact, part of the given order. The decisions you make based on "reason" follow from this submerged cultural background.

For example, your sense of the importance of the individual has a cultural history. This is both a positive history - hurrah for the Enlightenment and the Romantic movement - and a negative one - welcome to being narrow-cast ideodemographic consumer, my little capitalist cog, we've got you brand of rebellion on the sale rack.

That isn't to say that it isn't a good thing ultimately, but it isn't like you plucked it out of thin air - it was part of your lucky fate to be born into a Western, first-world, democracy - and (this is just an assumption) you had the good luck to be born into a family and social class that valued education and felt it was important for you to have that opportunity. Also, you are lucky enough to live in a time and place where you can type "I don't feel British" and not fear being locked up, beheaded, or socially ostracized.

I'm not saying that your POV isn't correct. I'd agree that, on the whole, a flexible, multi-cultural identity is probably more helpful and mentally healthy. I'm not sure I'd go as far as lm and claim that an interest in world music makes you an exiled philosopher king, but it isn't a bad thing. I'm just wondering how much of the anti-package identity isn't, in fact, just a particular brand of package.

[ Parent ]

anti-packaged identity = science fiction fan? by Alan Crowe (2.00 / 0) #13 Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 01:30:53 PM EST
If my identity isn't plucked out of thin air, where did it come from?

One idea is that it came from science fiction fandom. The heroes are men, humans, earthlings, rather than Americans, Russians, or Chinese. Perhaps this is simply to better sell to foreign markets. Perhaps it falls out naturally from placing your drama in a inter-planetary setting. Perhaps it is actually a flaw, the "it was raining on Mongo" flaw, that fails to see that planets are big and diverse.

But however it works, reading lots of fiction which assumes (often entirely implicitly) a global culture for the apes from the third rock from the sun, does tend to free one from historic and national identities.

[ Parent ]

You mock the ides of March by greyrat (2.00 / 0) #6 Sat Mar 15, 2008 at 08:38:01 PM EST
And my daughter will fucking hunt you down and kill you!!! You'd best send a birthday card. With a cash contribution to her birthday celebration.
~
There is absolutely no correlation or causation amongst intelligence, power, talent and wealth.
Kha-Nyou


I'm not done mocking the ides of March yet by lm (2.00 / 0) #10 Mon Mar 17, 2008 at 08:50:10 AM EST
Okay, now I'm done. Until next year, anyway.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Beware the ideas of March | 13 comments (13 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback