Print Story On the relative value of websites...
Money
By dmg (Tue Dec 02, 2008 at 02:55:13 PM EST) (all tags)
It seems that a website being dead does not stop it earning slightly more than one that is still alive.

Both sites however have a lot of catching up to do.



 
< Gods will be dragged screaming from the ether | Why an election would be undemocratic >
On the relative value of websites... | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Adequacy style troll by marvin (4.00 / 2) #1 Tue Dec 02, 2008 at 04:39:50 PM EST
Legends die hard.

nitpick: by dr k (4.00 / 2) #2 Tue Dec 02, 2008 at 08:54:27 PM EST
A quick check shows that "net worth" as used by that site is calculated by multiplying the daily ad revenue by 730 (2 x 365 days). That isn't the net worth, it is gross revenue. Net worth would be slightly lower due to administrative costs (hosting, network bandwidth, Chinese click farmers).

:| :| :| :| :|

Hulver's making beer money. by wiredog (4.00 / 1) #3 Wed Dec 03, 2008 at 04:17:27 AM EST
Rusty's making rent (or mortgage, anyway).

Looking at the traffic graph there's a slow downward trend at K5.

Earth First!
(We can strip mine the rest later.)

K5 IS DYING by sasquatchan (4.00 / 3) #4 Wed Dec 03, 2008 at 04:49:01 AM EST


[ Parent ]
normally you wouldn't get points for that by dark nowhere (4.00 / 2) #5 Wed Dec 03, 2008 at 06:28:22 AM EST
but I laughed despite myself. it's been a while.

Chill out, snowflake.

[ Parent ]
Netcraft confirms! Etc. by wiredog (4.00 / 1) #6 Wed Dec 03, 2008 at 06:29:32 AM EST


Earth First!
(We can strip mine the rest later.)

[ Parent ]
On the relative value of websites... | 6 comments (6 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback