Print Story The arrogance of the media made explicit
Diary
By lm (Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 12:36:03 PM EST) (all tags)
Howard Kurtz, media critic, lays out the truth. Speaking of Clinton's ``win'' of the Florida primary he says: Clinton is entitled to brag, but a victory is only a victory when the media say it is. Which is a large part of the problem.

Other blather follows.



The above quote does dovetail nicely with a BBC World Service segment on bias in the media I heard the other day. This segment contain the very same Mr. Kurtz complaining about how news media tends to offer sensationalism and bling rather than the important stories that ought to be followed. I quite like Kurtz's reporting on the media. But his actual journalism is usually far better than his blogging. On occasion, the commentary he adds to his media round-up style of blogging is unusually notable. Most of the time, however, when I read his blog I simply use it as a media aggregator.

Would you take a USD 3,000 course to learn how to seduce women? I'm trying to decide if the report is being facetious when he writes I know that the Mystery Method must work, or weenies wouldn't shell out three grand for it. I can't really vouch for the course. In fact I wouldn't want to. My only experience with courses of this sort is a friend I met over the Internet on a mailing list arguing about the existence of miracles. When he got married, my family flew out to Oklahoma City to attend. A year or so passed and I stopped hearing from him at all. Out of curiosity, I Googled his name and found a bunch of posts in various forums about how he'd been divorced and now, apparently, spends most of his spare time hunting down and seducing pretty women. I find that a sad tale. But the table turning at the end of the WaPo article does makes it worth a read.

A big story this morning is that Clinton didn't fight for unions while on the board of Wal-Mart. On the one hand, I'm not the sort of person that thinks a bona fide lefty needs to go around trying to organize every single business. But on the other hand, this seems to me to be a rather egregious oversight for anyone remotely on the left given the top-down union busting policies of Wal-Mart. This isn't a case where the subject didn't come up and Clinton failed to bring it up. This is a case where the board tackled the issue head on and Clinton apparently idly sat and watched the board do everything in their power to prevent unionization. If that is a fair assessment of the case, I think her lack of action unconscionable. But more important than my assessment will be the reaction of the various unions that have endorsed Clinton and how this plays out in the in the minds of the union rank and file that is a significant part of the Democratic base.

In other news, my foot pain is almost entirely gone. This makes me a bit more than a wee bit chipper. Here's hoping that someday soon my 6 mile weekend run won't lay me up so badly that I can't run the rest of the week. Not that I enjoy running, mind you. I'm only in it for the end results.

And if you watch American Idol, I found the segment last night on the young woman who had been top 20 on American Juniors to be quite funny. My eldest daughter, in her worst moments, acts just like her. Prima Donna, Baby! My daughter and her friend who were watching the show couldn't figure out what I was laughing at. But there's hope for my daughter. She's still 14 and I've no qualms about giving her a fair assessment of her capabilities (or lack thereof). She does have a nice voice. She doesn't, however, have the self-discipline (as of yet) to do as much as she could do with it. She could go far with it if she set her mind to it. I try to encourage her to do just that. But in the end, it's up to her.

And someday, probably sooner rather than later, my daughter is going to discover this blog and read the above paragraph. That will be fun.

I'm off to take `lunch' during which I will not eat but will be doing Latin homework.

< Insanity isn't so bad. | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
The arrogance of the media made explicit | 23 comments (23 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Read Weingartens Chats by wiredog (2.00 / 0) #1 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 12:41:14 PM EST
From the past 2 or 3 weeks. Apparently he wrote a story that was 10 times as long, which was spiked due to him promising anonymity to a source that the WaPo didn't want to give anonymity to. Also, according to Weingarten, The Method works.

You just have to be a low down lying dirtbag scum.

Earth First!
(We can strip mine the rest later.)



The best way to control someone is to lie to them. by codemonkey uk (2.00 / 0) #2 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 12:50:07 PM EST
Usually I'd accept cash or good of equivalent value as payment, but that little gem is free of charge, courtesy of the esteemed Ron Hubbard.

--- Thad ---
developer of ... ?
[ Parent ]

$3000 by ucblockhead (4.00 / 2) #3 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 12:51:59 PM EST
Huh. I'd think you'd be better off just spending $3000 on the woman you wanted to seduce.
----
ウセーバラケダ


inflation in las vegas by cam (2.00 / 0) #12 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 04:25:00 PM EST
Disappointed by anonimouse (2.00 / 0) #4 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 01:01:23 PM EST
As an outsider, I am disappointed that Guiliani didn't do better, and his campaigning was such a flop. I kept getting the impression that he kept banging on about how he was such a key in 9/11, whereas I think a better campaign would've driven home the fact that NYC did pretty well under his leadership and that he should be promoted from running 10million people to 250million.

Hillary sets my teeth on edge, and her f**k up on health reform under(?) Bill is still in my memory. She doesn't have the personal magnetism that hubby does which got so much done. I think I'd like Obama as the Democratic candidate.


Girls come and go but a mortgage is for 25 years -- JtL


A noun, a verb, and 9/11 by wiredog (2.00 / 0) #5 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 01:09:28 PM EST
That was pretty much every sentence of Rudy's during the campaign.

I'm gonna vote for the Irish guy in the primaries around here.

Earth First!
(We can strip mine the rest later.)

[ Parent ]

Rudy and NYC. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 1) #6 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 02:22:41 PM EST
The problem with Rudy running a "hey, I did pretty good with NYC" campaign is that his legacy in the city is pretty controversial. He would have been opening up a real can of worms if he'd invited people to look closely at his numbers and policies while mayor.

As for the health care plan. Her plan didn't substantially differ from the "universal" plans now being tossed around by every major figure in the Democrat Party. I think Bill deserves the credit for its collapse. Honestly, who takes the first major reform (one of two - the second being the transformation of "welfare" into "workfare") of his administration and puts his unelected, inexperienced wife in charge of the initiative? It was perceived as an arrogant slight (perhaps correctly) and the legislature reacted accordingly. That Hillary gets tarred with the brush of failure on that is, I think, unfair. It happened on Bill's watch, he could have fought for the reforms on his own, he could have avoided slapping Congress in the face, and instead he let it all go to hell by doing what he did best: a little as he could get away with.

[ Parent ]

Don't see too many problems by anonimouse (2.00 / 0) #7 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 02:56:50 PM EST
I get the impression that overall he was pretty good. Crime fell dramatically (whether that was down to him or not is debatable) and it seems like public service problems were also down.

He undeniably made a couple of mistakes in a few appointments, but he could reply to that with "Hey, everyone makes some mistakes, even Bill Clinton appointed Hillary!" and get some laughs with that.


Girls come and go but a mortgage is for 25 years -- JtL
[ Parent ]

Rudy. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 2) #8 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 03:30:27 PM EST
The crime stats are unclear. The data he uses comes from the FBI and they only collect data on certain crimes, the accusation is that Rudy shifted certain crimes into categories that the FBI doesn't collect (by reporting a violent mugging in which less than $50 was taken as petty larceny instead of assault, for example).

Even if the data withstood the scrutiny of the press, his achievements have a nasty legacy of violence against minorities. Several unarmed suspects were shot by the police, there was the Louima incident (where NYPD anally raped a suspect and, reportedly, told the suspect before penetration, "It's Giuliani time"), and there was the Dorismond incident in which, in an effort to prove the unarmed Dorismond (killed by police) was a hardened criminal, he released the suspect's sealed juvenile records to the press.

As for social services, they crapped out. School test scores went down and he cut the school budget.

Homeless services got their funding cut. When the legislation overrode his veto on funding, he used his mayor powers to evict the programs in five shelters he wanted closed.

He attempted to pull public funding for the Brooklyn Museum of Art when he disliked some anti-religious art that appeared in a show there. He was able to, for a brief time, pull funding making it the only instance of government censorship in New York since the Civil War.

Rudy inherited a $2 billion dollar deficit and left the city with a deficit of nearly $5 billion.

My point is not to suggest that some great stuff didn't happen as well. My point is just to stress that Rudy might have been in big trouble if he had to offer up his public record to close scrutiny. I mean, we've got people giving Clinton crap for being on the board of Wal-Mart, and that doesn't have a body count.

[ Parent ]

To be honest, I'm kind of sad Giuliani dropped out by lm (2.00 / 0) #9 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 03:44:08 PM EST
If he had won the GOP nod, the fall election would have been very, very interesting. I think some good investigative reporting would have unearthed some juicy bits from Giuliani Parners, Kerik, etc.

Also, IIRC, the ``Giuliani Time!'' bit of Alberto Louima's testimony has been discredited. Not that this makes the incident any more acceptable.

Lastly, I don't think that being on the Wal-Mart board by itself would have hurt Clinton much. For the most part the people who would have refused to vote for her for that alone wouldn't have been voting for her to begin with. But standing idly by why the board engages in union busting with nary a word of protest could be a very large problem for her.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

You're right on the "GT". by Christopher Robin was Murdered (2.00 / 0) #10 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 04:03:35 PM EST
I put "reported" 'cause I didn't rightly recall - but apparently the victim retracted his claim that the officers said that phrase.

To be fair, the story said the that the tapes show her trying to improve that position of women in the company and fight for environmental causes. The story could have read, "Clinton Fought for Women and Environment on Wal-Mart Board!" and then buried the bit about the unions at the bottom of the first page.

She didn't fight a battle she would have lost. When Barack dodges a fight it is proof of his deft statesmanship. When Clinton does it she's two-faced.

I hate politics.

[ Parent ]

I do think Clinton is two-faced by lm (4.00 / 1) #19 Fri Feb 01, 2008 at 09:19:59 AM EST
Probably not any more than any other politician. I don't really have a problem with politicians flip-flopping or even being duplicitous from time to time. That's how politics works. You've got to make deals and compromises from time to time. Other times, you've got to cut your losses. The only time,  I have it in for `flip-floppers' is when they start accusing others of flip-flopping or if it seems clear that they're flip-flopping entirely to pander to one group or the other.

Regardless, I don't think Clinton was two-faced for serving on Wal-Mart's board and not making a stand for organized labor. I think it's a case that illustrates poor judgment rather than duplicity.

In the end, I think Clinton would be a competent president. At this point, I think that of all the candidates that are still standing and have a reasonable shot at winning. But there are some whose, competency aside, I distrust on matters of judgment. While it's hard to say for sure, I think I'd rather have a bumbler I trust in office than someone who knows how to lead whom I don't trust.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Chomsky has the whole thing sussed by dmg (4.00 / 1) #11 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 04:10:20 PM EST
all you need to know about the media is that it is run for profit. everything else follows from this. I have stopped watching tv and Reading mainstream newspapers - there's no point...

check out "manufacturing consent". its a good read!

--
Hard work is morally wrong.


I dont have a tv by cam (4.00 / 1) #13 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 04:28:16 PM EST
but a state funded media portal opened up in the middle of my living room.

cam
Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic
[ Parent ]

And the best bit is by dmg (4.00 / 1) #14 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 07:30:49 PM EST
At least in the fascist state that is the modern UK, you are forced on pain of incarceration to fund it directly
--
Hard work is morally wrong.
[ Parent ]

OMG by ammoniacal (2.00 / 0) #15 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 09:21:06 PM EST
How is it that your family knows not of your use of this site?

Irony: ammo says it's time. Tom is blocked.


Oh, they know by lm (2.00 / 0) #16 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 09:26:53 PM EST
My wife doesn't read it on purpose. My mother does read it. I don't know (or care) if my sister reads it. My eldest daughter doesn't seem to have put two and two together yet with regards to what a blog actually is. My youngest daughter isn't of sufficient age to care yet.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Eldest: by ammoniacal (2.00 / 0) #17 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 09:31:03 PM EST
Surely, she wanders by on occasion and wonders "What's Pops writing?"

Irony: ammo says it's time. Tom is blocked.
[ Parent ]

I doubt it by lm (4.00 / 1) #18 Thu Jan 31, 2008 at 10:20:03 PM EST
More like, `there he goes again' after rolling her eyes.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Walmart and Unions by riceowlguy (2.00 / 0) #20 Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 10:57:07 AM EST
I don't want to have to pay twice as much for things so that people who didn't go to college, and who barely finished high school, can get paid $20/hr with full benefits to stand around saying "Hi, welcome to Wal-Mart!"



that's a straw man argument by lm (2.00 / 0) #21 Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 11:25:30 AM EST
I can't recall the last time I purchased an item at a unionized discount store that I could have purchased at Wal-Mart at a 50% discount. Nor do I know of any unionized retail stores that pay 20$/hour + benefits for greeters of any sort.

But answer me this, how do you feel about paying higher taxes so that federal and state governments can continue to subsidize Wal-Mart? If Wal-Mart paid a living wage, so many of their workers wouldn't qualify for food stamps, federal insurance and other programs.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Unionized discount store? by riceowlguy (2.00 / 0) #22 Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 12:28:17 PM EST
Nor do I know of any unionized retail stores that pay 20$/hour + benefits for greeters of any sort.

Isn't this because there aren't any unionized retail stores, period?

As far as Wal-Mart and living wages...the problem isn't that Wal-Mart jobs don't pay living wages.  Wal-Mart store jobs (not management or warehouse or shipping, but the greeters and the people who work the checkouts) should be taken by people who don't NEED to earn a living wage, such as high school kids, spouses of main income earners and retirees.  The problem is that we have no economy any more in rural areas so in many rural communities people ARE depending on Wal-Mart to provide them with their living, and that's not a sustainable situation.  We need to bring back manufacturing, and we will once our currency tanks and overseas goods stop being so much cheaper than domestic products.

[ Parent ]

Most `grocery' stores are now also discount stores by lm (2.00 / 0) #23 Mon Feb 04, 2008 at 01:30:33 PM EST
  1. Aside from which, most K*Marts are union. So is Costco.
  2. Union retailers generally pay 1 to 2 dollars per hour more than Wal-Mart and also have full benefits.
  3. The assertion that the overwhelming majority of Wal-Mart employers are people that don't need a living wage is a myth.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

The arrogance of the media made explicit | 23 comments (23 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback