Print Story Submit Story Error: invalid/empty fields: Title
Diary
By lm (Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 04:46:20 PM EST) (all tags)
MLPs. EMF's Unbelievable. Salt the wounds, the healing will come soon. Headache House. Bible study. Nancy Drew.


MLP

Interesting take on the glass ceiling in Salary, Gender and the Social Cost of Haggling by Shankar Vedantam. Apparently there is good evidence that a large part of the reason that men get higher salaries because they as for more money and more responsibility more often than women. But it isn't quite this simple. Women are more likely to penalized for asking for more money or more responsibility.

A real life nightmare of a way to die in Coroner: woman died of starvation. This is one of my wife's greatest fears. Whenever our daughters go on vacation and the house is empty save the two of us, she keeps her mobile phone practically glued to her palm.

For those who thought that Oliver Twist was unbelievable. This story is positively Dickensesque:Library thief gets choice of prison terms.

In Modern Language and Liturgical Deconstruction Deacon James Bryant discusses whether archaic or modern language should be used for the liturgy.  This was interesting to me mostly for the discussion of deconstructionism. Despite it being all the rage in philosophical, literary and artistic circles, I've never paid it much attention. It looks mostly like the Cartesian method applied to a world interpreted through a Nietzschean lens.

Nutritional labels might be coming to bottled beer in the US. Good timing on this piece as just yesterday I was arguing with Sonechka as to whether or not beer should have alcohol content disclosed on the label. She was pro-disclosure. I don't think it matters. If you're concerned as to whether one more beer might be too many, it probably is.

EMF's Unbelievable

Yesterday while browsing song lyrics for the brief paragraphs on love songs, I Googled EMF's Unbelievable. Way back when the only lyric I could understand was ``You're unbelievable.'' I always thought it was a love song. Then two days ago I read the lyrics online. Ouch. Someone certainly had their panties all in a bunch over something.

I always find it amusing how I misinterpret songs. Usually it's from hearing the lyrics incorrectly. In this case, I heard the lyric correctly but didn't hear any of the context so I took the lyric the wrong way. This also happens to me often in everyday conversation (although far less so since I was fitted with proper hearing aids in 2000 or 2001). When it happens in everyday conversation, it is usually far less amusing.

Salt the wounds, the healing will come soon

Two people I care about deeply had a good bonding experience and started to repair what was a rather damaged relationship. This is good as I think the two are good for each other. And, well, there is much more to this story that I won't be telling.

On the other hand, I'm still waiting for healing. My tears have been keeping my wounds clean but the wounds are still wounds. I see no evidence that they are starting to close.

Headache House

The electrical repair for The Headache House only ran ninety smackeroos. Apparently a wire in the basement had broken. This is good. Supposedly tomorrow the new tenants will be paying rent and be getting the keys. This is good. Probably. If they pay rent on time all year long, I might get back all the money that I've sunk into repairs from the last few tenants. On the other hand, if they don't pay, I have to evict them, and if they trash the place like the previous tenants, I'll have to pay all that money again.

I guess I'll also be cleaning some on Friday. By the time I finished painting the water closet last weekend, I was too tired, grumpy, and hot to be bothered cleaning up properly. There isn't much that needs to be done. Rudimentary dusting, running the Hoover™ and a touch of mopping. The most difficult time is just being alone and still motivating myself to do the needful. Difficulties aside, I have to admit there have been occasions recently where the alone time has been good for me even if difficult.

Bible study

The vespers service was nice last evening. I always like the sparsely attended services. There's something about one or two voices in a large, empty nave that oozes intimacy. I like that feeling. On the other hand, well, tears.

After vespers, the parish Bible study went over the twenty-first chapter of Luke. It's an interesting read. There were a couple places where knowledge of Greek could have come in handy. But we had no Greek text at our disposal. The nineteenth verse reads ``In your patience possess ye your souls'' in the Authorized Version. The context is unclear. It's either in the aftermath of the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans in 70CE or its in the future tribulations to come during the cataclysms earthly and cosmic that precede the last day.

It's an interesting line but the English `soul' doesn't really carry the full nuance of the Greek, psyche. Psyche is closer to the Latin animus. It is the animating force of all beings capable of motion (physical and intellectual). What we think of as soul is probably closer to the what the Greeks understood by nous which, unfortunately, is usually translated as ``intellect.'' I would translate the passage ``By patience, acquire true life.'' That takes a bit of liberty with the actual words of the text, but I think it carries the sense of the original better. Of course, I'm only an amateur scholar of Greek. One thing that surprised me was the word translated as `patience.' I thought for certain that it would be a derivitive of pascho  but it was hupomone. Pascho means to experience, to suffer, to endure, to do. That would have been interesting mostly because I find it fascinating that to the ancient Greeks to experience something was to suffer. But that's not what the text says at all.

Nancy Drew

The Nancy Drew movie finally made it to the second run cinema. I'll probably be taking my girls tonight. While I've not read a good review of the film, the worst review I've read puts it in line with most other movies targeted at young adolescent girls. So it can't be all that bad.

On the other hand I doubt it will have Gamera in it. Such a shame. That would be pure awesomness on a film reel, Nancy Drew and the Mystery of the Guardian of the Universe.

< All the stars | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Submit Story Error: invalid/empty fields: Title | 19 comments (19 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Nancy Drew by sasquatchan (4.00 / 1) #1 Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 05:02:37 PM EST
and the secret of Cthulhu.. Riiiight.. I'm sure the tentacles would be coming out in that one ...



Having just gotten back from having seen the film by lm (4.00 / 1) #4 Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 10:29:57 PM EST
My wife's opinion is that it needed more flesh eating zombies.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

beer labels by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #2 Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 06:00:55 PM EST
I don't think it's such a bad idea...different types of beer can vary wildly in alcohol, from 4% to 11%.
----
ウセーバラケダ


yes they can by lm (2.00 / 0) #3 Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 10:29:05 PM EST
I won't argue that it's a bad idea. The only entities that will be harmed are the breweries that are so small that the cost of testing and new labels is prohibitive.

That said, the overwhelming majority of beers on the shelves in the US are between 4.5 and 5.5 percent abv. I'm not convinced that mandatory labeling of alcohol content really adds value for most people. In most situations it doesn't really matter.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

We have mandatory labeling over here by hulver (4.00 / 1) #6 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 03:27:03 AM EST
It has to state the % alc. level in wine, beer, cider, anything with alcohol in it.

If anything it's led to an increase in high strength brews. The ones with higher alcohol content sell better, as a result it's harder to buy tasty beer that won't get you wasted after a few cans.

There's very little choice under 5% anymore.
--
smart, pretty, sane. pick two - georgeha
[ Parent ]

Most of the ales are 4-5% by Phage (4.00 / 2) #7 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 03:35:04 AM EST


The Czar of Accounting. No Nit Too Small To Pick
[ Parent ]

bitter by Merekat (4.00 / 2) #8 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 04:19:35 AM EST
Or ale. Lager is generally shit anyway.

[ Parent ]

Lager especially, by hulver (4.00 / 2) #9 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 05:10:45 AM EST
but it's hard to find a decent bitter that's < 5%.

And it's just hard to find decent cider anywhere, whatever the strength. It's disappointing when the only decent cider you can find is 7.5%. Can't really enjoy it when you're blathered after 3.
--
smart, pretty, sane. pick two - georgeha
[ Parent ]

Then don't drink so fast . . . by slozo (4.00 / 2) #12 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 07:41:39 AM EST
. . . if it's taste you're after.

All the popular ciders available in Canada are below 7% . . . what's with the high alc. content for them in the UK? Me, I actually wish we had a good one for 7 or 8% . . .

[ Parent ]

That's what the naysayers in the states have said by lm (2.00 / 0) #11 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 07:20:20 AM EST
The debate over labeling beer and wine with alcohol content has been raging in the states for decades. Those opposed argue that (1) it will lead to an arms race where all the manufacturers try to out do each other and that (2) it will only server aid those who are drinking entirely to get drunk.

Stateside, I don't think the latter point really holds because (1) precious few people here read labels to start with and (2) there is already a slew of code words (ice, extra, etc.)  used in names to indicate beers with higher than average alcohol content.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Deconstructionism by ni (4.00 / 2) #5 Thu Aug 02, 2007 at 10:42:51 PM EST
Giving a definitive (heh) definition of deconstructionism is pretty widely thought to be a hopeless endeavour. As negative critique, I'm unsure your definition captures the essential subversiveness of deconsructionism. There's always a sort of pervasive mischievous tone to it that I don't think Descartes would dream of. (Niezsche was ideologically subversive, of course, but deconstructionism's subversiveness is essential linguistic in nature.) Also, deconstruction is (it seems to me) a fundamentally hermeneutic act, and if we are trying to describe it by reference to the techniques of others it seems like we ought to squeeze in someone from that tradition. Alas, my knowledge of the history of hermeneutics is limited, and I don't know who best deserves credit.

I skimmed the wikipedia article on deconstructionism to see if there was some particularly lucid definition I was unaware of, but didn't find anything decisive. The most illuminating of them (and I admit this may be biased by my particular interests) is probably this section, though:

One of the most popular definitions of deconstruction is by Paul de Man, who explained, "It's possible, within text, to frame a question or undo assertions made in the text, by means of elements which are in the text, which frequently would be precisely structures that play off the rhetorical against grammatical elements." (de Man, in Moynihan 1986, at 156.) Thus, viewed in this way, "the term 'deconstruction' refers in the first instance to the way in which the 'accidental' features of a text can be seen as betraying, subverting, its purportedly 'essential' message" (Rorty 1995).


"Not of this world..." -- 256, on the subject of the New Jersey Turnpike


Descartes not subversive? by lm (2.00 / 0) #10 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 07:07:37 AM EST
The man who, in early 17th century Europe when people were being executed right and left for believing in the wrong flavor of Christianity, argued that religion was for those who lacked sufficient mental capacity to think for themselves and lived to tell about it wasn't subversive? I think Descartes only seems unsubversive because his thinking dominates modernity, especially the field of science.

That's really besides the point. What I was trying to say is that the Cartesian method (break everything down into its component parts, throwing away every you're not certain of, building a new synthesis, and critically and exhaustively examining the new product) applied to the Nietzsche's understanding of meaning (a projection of the will of the great, those who `know') is what I understand deconstruction to be all about regardless of the sphere (linguistics, literature, art). I think that view is very compatible with your citation from Rorty.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

More of a critique of the Cartesian method. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 1) #15 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 01:55:23 PM EST
A deconstructionist would argue that what you threw out was always actually the important stuff that would undermine your unexamined assumptions. Your synthesis always automatically misses the point because it is only achieved by suppressing elements that you can never really get rid of and, if looked at, flip your conclusion. Deconstruction would be the process of recovering that thrown away material and critiquing your synthesis with it.

[ Parent ]

Okay, I get it now by lm (4.00 / 2) #16 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 03:21:48 PM EST
By deconstructing your post, I see that what you really mean to say is that DESCARTES ROCKS THE HOUSE DOWN.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Rocks the house up! by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 1) #17 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:19 PM EST
Your unexamined phallogocentic directional assumptions are showing.

[ Parent ]

Greek in the bible and God Of War by theboz (4.00 / 1) #13 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 11:57:26 AM EST
When I was younger and a religious nut, I too studied the greek versions of words and how they are used to better interpret parts of the bible. So it amused me greatly to see a character named Kratos in the game God of War, especially given the dual meaning of not only a word meaning force or strength, but also that it is the origin of the word "crater", and Kratos had jumped off of a cliff and was heading towards the ground.
- - - - -
That's what I always say about you, boz, you have a good memory for random facts about pussy. -- joh3n


Everybody who is anybody is deconstructing. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 1) #14 Fri Aug 03, 2007 at 01:43:06 PM EST
I don't know that it is all the rage anymore. In lit crit circles, anyway, the revolution seems to have come and gone.

For about two decades, from the '60s to the '80s, one could find dedicated "deconstructionists" about. But then it became a generalized sort of tag - spreading into fields outside of lit crit and philosophy, mutating into a vague verb, becoming a content-free hipster slang term, and, finally, reaching a sort of nadir by showing up as the name for a Batman villain in the mid-90s - for breaking down the assumptions of a piece. I recall the term being so general that professors would use it to mean "let's look carefully at this," as in "let's deconstruct this line of poetry and see what X meant."

When I was a student (and, admittedly, that was a long time ago) it had been almost entirely replaced as the hip theory by reader response and post-colonial theories.

In fact, as I recall, even non-academic venues were no longer in the concept's thrall by the early '90s. Wired magazine, that venerable People of the cyber-Narcissus set, had a graphic on pomo terms digital elitists needed to know, ranked by whether their star was on the rise or decline. Even then, some time in like '93, deconstruction was ranked as terminally outdated among the smart set.

I think one can no longer provide an accurate definition for it because - like "love" or "truth" - it is one of those concepts that have been hollowed out in favor of ease of linguistic portability. It simply sounded too good to be burdened by meaning.



look! i did it! it's me, julie! by rubylouwho (2.00 / 0) #18 Mon Aug 06, 2007 at 09:28:24 PM EST
i finally opened an account because i just could not let the brilliance of "nancy drew and the mystery of the guardian of the universe" slide. kudos!

and, now that i'm here, i have no idea what to do with this account, and no time to figure it out. but i can comment, and that's the important thing, right?



What you can do with an account by lm (2.00 / 0) #19 Tue Aug 07, 2007 at 08:42:46 AM EST
Make comments.
Write journal entries.
Upload files.
See other people's uploaded files.
Read and post to The Hole.
Send and receive private messages.
Submit and vote on stories sent into the queue.

The Hole is a special place. It's temporary. Instead of getting archived, the stories (and the attached comments) in The Hole get deleted. It doesn't get crawled by the various search engines so it's a little more private than your average watering hole on the Internet.

Submitting and voting on stories doesn't get used much on this web site. Scoop, the software that runs the site, was originally designed to be used for collaborative media sites where the users would vote on what gets posted to the front page. Sometimes that happens here, but most people only read HuSi for the diaries.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Submit Story Error: invalid/empty fields: Title | 19 comments (19 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback