Print Story Book Business
Diary
By Kellnerin (Fri May 25, 2007 at 10:40:29 PM EST) WFC, WFC Book, WFC Anthology, highlights of my email box (all tags)
What I'm working on, and what I'm not working on yet.


I FINALLY FINISHED my editorial pass on the WFC Book. Some forty-nine stories (out of a whopping total of eighty-six total entries to all five WFCs). I find in re-reading everything over the past couple of months that I'm rediscovering how much I love some of the entries that these Fun Challenges have produced.

Next stop, layout; I've actually started some of the work for that. Sorry for the delay; watch this space for further updates.

MEANWHILE, IN ORDER TO FILL some of the WFC void, I thought I would do something that fleece suggested a while back, and collect everyone's decoy self-critiques during the anonymous voting period:

2 plus 3 equals 5
WFC3 ("Egg"): Agree with previous comments. HuSi references dragged it down. Otherwise, interesting. I think it's been ahead because several folks like it in addition to something else, sort of like how the Booker Prize goes to the commitee members collective second favorite.
WFC4 ("Three Words"): Good dialogue. Maybe too much packed into too little space? The bar scene was my favorite.
WFC5 ("Knock Knock"): Thank you for resisting the temptation to use "chew the fat" in this story. More lasagna, which should be expected at a pot luck, I guess. Good dialog. No story.

aethucyn
WFC5 ("What Do You Want?"): Like the idea. A bit cutesy. Suffers from being so brief.
WFC5 ("Taste Test"): This one reminded me that the best part of a lot of parties is being anti-social at them.

ana
WFC1 ("You're Not Ed Hulver"): I'm pretty sure I've read this before someplace.
WFC3 ("Next Time, Last Time"): Surreal nightmare of a broken man, who's not even very coherent.
WFC5 ("Almond Torte"): is there a point?

aphrael
WFC1 ("The Endless Wheel"): Interesting concept, so-so execution; the action scene in particular sucked.

BlueOregon
WFC5 ("The Leaving Agent"): "the perfect mixture of the ground seed of a grass with a single-cell fungus" reminds me too much of the "Tasty Wheat" scene in The Matrix, but this was very not-post-apocalyptic. I'm not sure which one is the pun. It skips all over the place.

Driusan
WFC2 ("The Colony"): I can't help but feel there's something wrong with the science in this, though I'm not entirely sure what. But I can mostly write it off as the narrator not understanding it since it's in the first person. I like the twist.

fleece
WFC3 ("one-twenty"): The David Lynch-esque approach to chronological disorder and inference made me seasick. I liked it anyway.
WFC4 ("The Odd Spot"): animal sex? gross.
WFC5 ("The Review"): like FIRST POST! I wonder if you're just taking the piss

Kellnerin
WFC1 ("The Man in the 20th Century House"): Where there should have been a punchline or some kind of resolution, there was a vampire ex machina.
WFC2 ("The Color of Rain"): Dunno if the ending bothers me on this one, but something does. Maybe its total lack of simplicity.
WFC3 ("Terzanelle to the Departed Beloved"): A potentially neat idea, not so well executed, but I can't say I could have done better.
WFC3 ("Homecoming"): A solid story, intriguing premise, but so low-key it sort of fails to stand out.
WFC4 ("Mont Blanc"): So oblique, almost misses the theme.
WFC5 ("Desired"): Has all the required elements, but in the wrong proportion, I think. Hard to feel sympathy for the narrator.

persimmon
WFC1 ("Songs of the Redeemed"): Has the most far-flung "little people" and "Ed Hulver", but is largely incoherent. Also, nothing actually happens in the story.
WFC4 ("Grocery List"): Sad, but sparse. Crappily formatted.

Scrymarch
WFC2 ("Reception"): Reminds me of p-m-agapow's description of the works of Ursula Le Guin: A not entirely unpleasant beating about the head with a sociology textbook.
WFC3 ("Single"): This is ok, but I've a feeling it was written in a bit of a rush.
WFC5 ("Fusion"): Smug, too short, and occassionally funny.

toxicfur
WFC3 ("Agency"): This is a nice vignette with some interesting imagery, but I feel like the ending kind of comes out of nowhere. Also, while I like the use of psychobabble, it seems forced at times, and awkwardly used.
WFC4 ("A Harsh Mistress"): I like the interplay of bad porn and bad real-life sex, but the writing is somewhat awkward, and the build-up is too rushed.
WFC5 ("Dream Logic"): I cringed at the Gaiman quote at the beginning (what is this, a research paper?), but I liked this story more than I expected to.

yicky yacky
WFC1 ("Bouncing off the Walls"): Like '... seen Kelly?' and others, had a great set-up which then died away. As with 'The Hill', the shit pun made me laugh. Voted for.

Does anyone else find that sometimes it's the decoy review that solidifies your guess of who wrote what? Or am I the only one who thinks this much about it ...


I'VE BEEN TRYING to fix my sleep schedule; in the past few months I've adopted the same habits as D, who has a much shorter commute than I [had | will have]. My boss-to-be emailed me to say that I'm scheduled for an all-day training session on my first day at work, starting at 9:00 sharp -- but he's in at 6:00 so I can get in early and get settled beforehand if I want. Oh, good.

I've become a can't-drink-coffee-at-night wuss, or I should have -- instead I've been either absent-minded or in denial. It doesn't help that the coffee in the pitcher in the fridge was brewed extra strong, so it can take ice melting in it, though the actual strength depends on how quickly you drink it. It doesn't help that I recently bought two 24-ounce glasses so they'd have room for ice, but truth is that they have more room than they really should.

It also doesn't help when it's ninety degrees out.

MY EMAIL ACCOUNT is already set up and I've even got Web access to it. I've never had email for a job I hadn't started before (I've received email from before I started -- mass mails and such -- but it's never been set up this far in advance and I've never had access to it before showing up). I've already been invited to a meeting I can't make (I have training all that week). It's too bad, because though I'm not sure I have anything to contribute, it sounded potentially interesting to listen in on.

Some other things I have learned:

The wiki is down for maintenance today. So, I guess there's a company wiki.

This morning I found my inbox spammed with automated build messages. I told D this and he was amused, because in his job, he's the one who sends out the automated build messages.

"How many do you send a day?"

"Three."

"I've gotten, like, twenty-five this morning. Look at this shit."

He glanced at the subject lines and seemed impressed with the release engineer. More of them kept coming throughout the day -- continuous builds. I see email filters in my future.

I keep opening messages from people in my department, skimming them, and telling myself, "I'm going to come back to this and try to understand it later."

Before today, I'd never received an email that used the word "h0rked" before. I feel like I've arrived, somehow; just where exactly, I'm not sure.

< A couple of things. | Not Much >
Book Business | 16 comments (16 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
That reminds me by blixco (2.00 / 0) #1 Fri May 25, 2007 at 10:47:30 PM EST
THANKS for taking on such a gigantic task as creating a book where there was none.

It also reminds me that I need to write more.  But not now.  Right now I am listening to ELO and trying to get tired.
---------------------------------
"You bring the weasel, I'll bring the whiskey." - kellnerin


creating by Kellnerin (4.00 / 1) #6 Sat May 26, 2007 at 08:07:38 AM EST
The hard part of creation was mainly done by people other than me. And the neat thing is that it's naturally divided into bite-size pieces (each story) and medium-size ones (each WFC) to work on at any one time, so it doesn't feel terribly daunting. I've learned quite a bit in the process and would probably do some things differently next time, though I'll probably forget by the time that comes around.

And yes, yes, you do need to write more.

--
"If a tree is impetuous in the woods, does it make a sound?" -- aethucyn
[ Parent ]

radical by fleece (2.00 / 0) #2 Fri May 25, 2007 at 11:12:39 PM EST
must have taken ages to collate all that.

New jobs are good because nobody expects anything from you yet.



not too long, actually by Kellnerin (2.00 / 0) #7 Sat May 26, 2007 at 08:12:25 AM EST
The thing about this job is that it's the one where I least know what to expect from it. The advance email is a strange, filtered view of that.

--
"If a tree is impetuous in the woods, does it make a sound?" -- aethucyn
[ Parent ]

Wow by ammoniacal (4.00 / 1) #3 Sat May 26, 2007 at 01:02:49 AM EST
I feel like killing myself, and I didn't even submit an entry.

General rules are: All skirts no lower then [sic] two inches below the knee (unless it's for Church) --Travis Frey


Heh by yicky yacky (4.00 / 1) #4 Sat May 26, 2007 at 06:51:20 AM EST

I find the fact that many of the critiques are negative quite amusing. It's as if either the author thought they might throw people off the scent in treating them that way, or that the criticism of the piece accurately reflects authorial frustrations with the final story -- although, by nature, a more informed type of disappointment than with the other pieces. More Nietzsche, less Morrissey, people.


----
Mr Murdoch can take substantial credit for the tide of vulgarity that now floods the UK. - Martin Wolf, FT


bit of both, I think by Kellnerin (2.00 / 0) #8 Sat May 26, 2007 at 08:29:30 AM EST
Of course, it would also help to look at the reviews in comparison to each author's comments on the other stories, to see how they line up. Sometimes I've actualy skewed my self-review to be less harsh than I felt about the piece, because though I won't hurt my own feelings I never bash other people's stuff quite that much. Actually, I like how some of the reviews comment without actually giving an opinion, positive or negative.

--
"If a tree is impetuous in the woods, does it make a sound?" -- aethucyn
[ Parent ]

consistency is important by persimmon (4.00 / 1) #11 Sun May 27, 2007 at 02:03:27 AM EST
This is why I'm careful to conspicuously hate everything.
-----
"Nature is such a fucking plagarist."
[ Parent ]

I admit by Kellnerin (2.00 / 0) #13 Sun May 27, 2007 at 09:01:51 AM EST
I look forward to your reviews. I always prefer a reaction of "this sucked" to "yeah, OK" (the worst thing, I think, is to make no impression), and with the equal-opportunity persimmon-hate it's hard to take it too personally.

--
"If a tree is impetuous in the woods, does it make a sound?" -- aethucyn
[ Parent ]

Clearly... by ana (2.00 / 0) #5 Sat May 26, 2007 at 08:01:42 AM EST
story self-critiques need to use the word "h0rked".

And thanks for the editing-that-was and the layout-to-be. And for catching at least one stupid blunder in one of my stories.

Power up your flaming yo-yos already! --StackyMcRacky


just what we need ... by Kellnerin (2.00 / 0) #9 Sat May 26, 2007 at 08:37:36 AM EST
a Writing Fun Challenge Entry Review Fun Challenge (though I did have fun doing the 6-word reviews for WFC4).

--
"If a tree is impetuous in the woods, does it make a sound?" -- aethucyn
[ Parent ]

Nice touch on the Terzanelle review. by Christopher Robin was Murdered (4.00 / 2) #10 Sat May 26, 2007 at 10:41:59 AM EST
". . . but I can't say I could have done better."

Missed it at the time, but that's funny.



Congratulations by Scrymarch (2.00 / 0) #12 Sun May 27, 2007 at 03:02:06 AM EST
On the new job.

fwiw, I also have to soften my self reviews in an attempt to conceal them.

The Political Science Department of the University of Woolloomooloo



thanks by Kellnerin (4.00 / 1) #14 Sun May 27, 2007 at 09:06:04 AM EST
and I think the week-of-voting games with the reviews are entertaining in a similar vein as the WFCs themselves -- in the main round, everyone's working with the same theme and taking it in different directions; with the reviews, everyone's presenting their takes on the same stories, and it can be an interesting spectrum of reactions. More than once the comments on my stories (and often it's one of your comments) have sort of solidified why I feel vaguely dissatisfied about a piece, which is cool.

--
"If a tree is impetuous in the woods, does it make a sound?" -- aethucyn
[ Parent ]

This is true by Scrymarch (2.00 / 0) #16 Thu May 31, 2007 at 12:03:41 AM EST
It's perverse, in a way, that I deliberately try to avoid things which would easily identify myself. It's probably easier for me as I don't diarise so much. I'm not sure whether it's an attempt to avoid personal writing cliches, or a desire for the writing to be sufficiently distinctive that it can be spotted without my name attached to it.

But for the week of voting game, the focus is much more on concealment - not giving away the personal connection to the piece.

Which is also why it's very cool you review every piece, no matter how hard it's tried to disguise itself or whether it fell in a bit of a heap. I usually crave feedback and heartily disagree with it :)

The Political Science Department of the University of Woolloomooloo

[ Parent ]

so once you've finished the book by aphrael (2.00 / 0) #15 Sun May 27, 2007 at 11:22:27 AM EST
we should apply pressure to 256 to start up a new wfc.

or failing that, just declare a new one. :)

If television is a babysitter, the internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up.


Book Business | 16 comments (16 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback