Print Story With or without you
By TheophileEscargot (Tue Oct 09, 2007 at 12:21:22 PM EST) Reading, Me, MLP (all tags)
What I'm Reading: "I Married a Communist". Me. Web.

What I'm Reading
Finished I Married a Communist by Philip Roth. Reaction: whoa. One of the most powerful and disturbing books I've read in a while.

It tells the story of a doomed marriage in the McCarthy era. Self-educated socialist firebrand Ira Ringold marries actress and socialite Eve Frame. The marriage breaks down and she denounces him as a Communist, ending his career.

It's told from odd points of view: the shadowy narrator Nathan Zuckerman, who hero-worshipped Ringold as a boy, encounters Rinn's older brother Murray. It's told unwaveringly from their points of view and in their voices, in complete defiance of the standard writing-workshop of Show Don't Tell: everything here is clearly told.

The book captures superbly well the passion and intellectual excitement of the youthful Zuckerman at encountering Rinn and socialist ideas for the first time. It makes it all the more disturbing as Rinn's feet of clay are steadily revealed. The book has some ruthlessly cynical touches as it nears the end: the urge to do good is itself represented as something inevitably ending in something bad, though that may just be supposed to be a sign of Zuckerman's own cynicism.

Didn't really notice it in the other Roth book I read "The Plot Against America", but you can definitely see signs of what they call Roth's misogyny. It seems to be tempered by a streak of misanthropy; but while the men are grandly evil the women are just squalidly evil. Didn't realise it till I looked it up afterwards but apparently this book is partly an attack on Roth's ex-wife. She wrote a memoir presenting him badly after their messy divorce: the character of Eve Frame is apparently an exaggerated portrait of her, and this memoir is equated with the sensational book "I Married a Communist" Frame has ghost-written.

Overall though, a powerful story of layers of betrayal: well worth reading if you've got the stomach for it.

Getting wound up by the current project at work. It's a nightmarish bit of integration of wildly disparate, hideously convoluted, separate systems. Getting anything done takes an age: fixing one thing breaks everything else, fixing the tiniest navigation problem involves tortuous tracking back through databases and XSL. Even getting an update to show takes about 15 minutes of manual fucking around (this isn't PC-land, I have to reinstall apps on consumer hardware) and then half the time it doesn't show at all and I have to undo step by step to find out what went wrong. It's really doing my head in.

Jesus cat.

Howard Waldrop on pens. I'm a bit disappointed actually. The guy's a brilliant fiction writer, but the paper-blogging concept doesn't seem to be working: he's kind of laboriously going through the kind of tips and information that we're deluged with. Go and read Them Bones or A Dozen Tough Jobs anyway.

< 2007.10.09: ee 2 the pie eye, or: 40 years | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
With or without you | 7 comments (7 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Lord Jim by LinDze (4.00 / 1) #1 Tue Oct 09, 2007 at 01:28:37 PM EST
The thing about writing teacher folks is that usually theyre not actually authors.

-Lin Dze
Arbeit Macht Frei
"Show don't tell" is a very good rule by johnny (4.00 / 1) #5 Wed Oct 10, 2007 at 09:53:52 AM EST
It should only be disregarded by masters. Conrad was a master.

I'm not a writing teacher, but I would be happy to play one on television.
... this is dreamworld after all... it isn't? Shit.

[ Parent ]
fair enough by LinDze (4.00 / 1) #7 Wed Oct 10, 2007 at 06:24:56 PM EST
I suppose its the literary worlds "rule of thirds"

-Lin Dze
Arbeit Macht Frei
[ Parent ]
Pens... by Metatone (4.00 / 1) #2 Tue Oct 09, 2007 at 03:35:05 PM EST
Kind of disappointing article that one. Just like B&W photography, continuing with an old system in a digital age requires some adaptation. The smart pen user now goes with bottles of ink if economy is the issue...

Roth by sasquatchan (4.00 / 1) #3 Wed Oct 10, 2007 at 04:46:11 AM EST
has his writing gotten any better ? A friend we exchange books with regularly lent me the Lindburgh alternative-future book, and I couldn't get 40 pages into it.

I've read bad books, I've gotten through tortured writing. I could not read Roth. WORST. PROSE. EVAR.

This was an earlier book by TheophileEscargot (2.00 / 0) #4 Wed Oct 10, 2007 at 09:17:05 AM EST
But I thought the quality of the prose was very good in both books.
It is unlikely that the good of a snail should reside in its shell: so is it likely that the good of a man should?
[ Parent ]
watercat by johnny (4.00 / 1) #6 Wed Oct 10, 2007 at 09:59:51 AM EST
Thanks a lot, Theophile. I'll have that tune in my head for the next two weeks.
... this is dreamworld after all... it isn't? Shit.
With or without you | 7 comments (7 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback