Print Story He pukes, he scores
By nebbish (Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 12:50:54 AM EST) World Cup, football, footy, footie, reading, books, telly (all tags)
You-know-what inside. Also, a book and a TV programme.

I watch football because it's a fun, enjoyable game, filled to the brim with skill and tactics. Which is why I'm fed up of watching England.

We've scraped our way through this tournament by good luck and have yet to play a game worth watching. Now we're to face a criminally depleted Portugal next Saturday, the prospect of reaching the semi-finals without having played one decent game is a real possibility. It'll be a very hollow victory if we win this tournament (not that I think we will). Just compare the way we're playing now to the way we were playing in 2002 and 2004.

My two pennorth on tactics - dump Lampard, bring on Lennon.


Drank too much. All day barbie on Saturday then the whole day in the pub on Sunday. I'm packing in drinking for a bit after the World Cup, it's wearing me out. I'm only used to drinking one night a week.

There were loads of Germans at the barbecue so a good atmosphere whilst they thrashed Sweden. Also, fantastic sausages.


Not had much luck lately. Got part way through St Kilda: Island on the Edge of the World, apparently an anthropological classic, but the subject matter is very narrow and I found it a bit boring. I usually like stuff like this as well.

St Kilda is one of the remotest Scottish islands, and for hundreds of years its small population lived well harvesting seabirds and developing their own culture and traditions. Then ties with the mainland got stronger, and after a long decline the last of the islanders left in the 1920s. It's about how contact fucks up small, enclosed societies - which, on St Kilda, happened in almost laboratory conditions.

Basically the book takes three hundred odd pages to tell you that. It gets boring.


Saxondale is a just what I've been waiting for, a great Steve Coogan character, done affectionately rather than spitefully like Partridge. Although much has been made of Saxondale being an ex-roadie, he's someone we've all met - one of those working-class hippies who are actually a bit violent. Coogan plays him as intelligent and functional with a great relationship with his girlfriend, which is nice - I'm fed up with dark comedy.

The first episode lacked real hilarity but I still chuckled all the way through - looking forward to tonight's.

< Photo Monday: Owls | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
He pukes, he scores | 19 comments (19 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
(Comment Deleted) by yicky yacky (4.00 / 1) #1 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 12:59:21 AM EST

This comment has been deleted by yicky yacky

Holland-Portugal by nebbish (2.00 / 0) #3 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 01:04:51 AM EST
The ref was so shit he lost control of the game completely. No game should see sixteen yellow cards and three reds. Can't see how Portugal needed more reds, it was chaos on both sides.

There were actually good games in the last two tournaments where we took total control - against Denmark in 2002 and Croatia in 2004 come to mind. OK they're hardly world class (actually, no, they're pretty good), but then neither is Trinidad and Tobago. I just want to see good football matches like those again - this is crap.

It could always get better. I hope for it to get better.

It's political correctness gone mad!

[ Parent ]
I watched both games this weekend by cam (2.00 / 0) #7 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 02:17:17 AM EST
and I am on the ref's side with the Netherlands - Portugal game. They were diving all over the place. If they lost posession of the ball they took a dive. There was no way he could base any decision on the player's reaction.

The elbow in the head? rofl. The Netherlands also constantly appealed. Anything and everything. The players swarmed the ref everytime there was even a minimal stoppage ... bleh.

Some questions though; the American commentators said the one forward (centre-forward) doesnt win and that two forwards are needed to win. That a fair statement? They also said, after the goal, Rooney was more involved because he was one on one, when they had one forward, he had two people marking him.

Another statement they made was the Beckham isnt much chop outside of set pieces. The US soccer commentator said he slowed the game down to much on the ?left? side?

The other thing I noticed in the England game was the English played the ball around four backs before an attacking play. They would move it back and forth several times. In Ice Hockey they do that to get the defence moving and to split them, or get them out of position. But I didnt see Ecuador's midfield line moving much at all. They were pretty static despite that happening. Is that why England was doing long balls, to get behind Ecuador's midfield because it was following the ball?

Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic

[ Parent ]
Beckham by jump the ladder (4.00 / 3) #10 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 02:43:53 AM EST
He can't get past people nor run down the wings but when he is playing well, he's an excellent crosser of the ball into box. You need an attacking right back like Gary Neville to run down the wing and lay off the ball to him. he'll play better when Gary Neville comes back from injury.

Ecuador's tactics were very defensive so there was a problem breaking down the their defence with short passing and hence the long balls you spotted.

[ Parent ]
Becks by Breaker (4.00 / 3) #11 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 02:47:58 AM EST
Plays on the right midfield; although the commentator may have been referring to the left as Ecuador saw it.

Again, we played a team that concentrates on keeping the ball, not getting drawn and keeping 10 men behind the ball.  Our passes through the defence are indeed intended to bring the opposition forward.

Carrick did a wonderful job trying to thread a ball through the limited gaps in midfield; he got it right a fair few times. 

So, again, Engerlandland just had to play at the opposition and hope to not get caught out on the break.  And we got lucky there I think.

Portugal are more likely to actually want to play a game of football against us.  Should be a good match.

Fingers crossed for the Aussies this arvo though.

[ Parent ]
(Comment Deleted) by yicky yacky (4.00 / 7) #14 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 04:01:42 AM EST

This comment has been deleted by yicky yacky

[ Parent ]
Feature request by R Mutt (4.00 / 3) #15 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 04:12:47 AM EST
"Great Comments" sidebar like the dark-blue-right-hand box on Metafilter's front page. It could show the N most recent comments to get more than X 4's.

[ Parent ]
Thanks by cam (4.00 / 1) #16 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 06:49:31 AM EST
It is half-time in the Au-Italy game; and I do believe the Italians are enjoying playing a physical no-nonsense form of soccer. There are several grins on Italian player's faces and zero histrionics. Even the Italian guy that went down, and stayed down, had a legit reason.

Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic

[ Parent ]
(Comment Deleted) by yicky yacky (4.00 / 2) #17 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 08:17:01 AM EST

This comment has been deleted by yicky yacky

[ Parent ]
lol by cam (4.00 / 1) #18 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 08:42:05 AM EST
It isnt like Italy has no history of doing this stuff, and that the ref should be aware of that when determining if an Italian falling over in the goal square might be a little bit fake.

Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic

[ Parent ]
Stevie G and Fat Frank by jump the ladder (4.00 / 2) #2 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 01:03:21 AM EST
Were woeful yesterday so that's why we looked so disjointed and they didn't have excuse of not having a holding player to prevent them playing their attackling football. Becks, not sue to drop him or not, he has played crap but has made a couple of crucial chances. I'd play him for 60-70 minutes and then let a fresh Lennon rip the tired defences apart which is what SGE seems to be doing.

Also apart from Sweden everyone else has played very defensively against us which won't be the case as we meet the better teams. Orc Boy is champing at the bit, the defence looked a little bit better yesterday than against Sweden and Hargreaves and Carrick did OK.

I suppose I'm used to winning ugly as I support Chelsea and it reminded me of the performances we ground out in the middle third of last season.

You give me hope by nebbish (4.00 / 1) #4 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 01:06:31 AM EST
Yeah, I'm hoping for better football, it just seems to be a long time coming. The Chelsea analogy is a good one, hopefully it's also correct.

It's political correctness gone mad!

[ Parent ]
Attn: HMS GSMO Passengers... by Breaker (4.00 / 4) #5 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 01:12:14 AM EST
Might I just remind you that

a) We're through to the quarters
b) our quarter final opponents have tucked themselves up by playing a dirty game to qualify and c) the quarter final is a good place for Lampard to rediscover what his shooting boots are for
d) we've been lucky so far and luck carries you in cup competitions

So, Roon child looking more match fit, Lennon a good shock sub for the final 20 minutes, Carrick finally in the squad.


It'll be a very hollow victory by TPD (4.00 / 2) #6 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 01:35:49 AM EST
if we win this tournament (not that I think we will).

Bah - You'll be dancing in the streets along with the rest of us.

might not have been the prettiest game yesterday but personally I thought it wasn't bad (yeah I know you want to be playing better than wasn't bad at this stage), but it was pretty comfortable in conditions England didn't really want to over exert themselves you can't really blame them for not doing too much more than neccessary.

Carrick, Cole and Rooney all put in excellent performances. Robinson's Deer in headlights act was a bit nervy but beyond that I'm pretty upbeat about the game.

why sit, when you can sit and swivel with The Ab-SwivellerTM

Saxondale by Phage (4.00 / 1) #8 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 02:18:43 AM EST
I thought a lot better than Partridge.

I've met several people like that who used to be someone associated with the music biz in the 70-80's and are now reduced to rather more manual labour. Saxondale looks perfectly functional compared to some nof the ones I've met.

Loved the scene where he shot the animal rights activist. It was a bit far fetched (pigeons ?) but great.

It was top stuff by nebbish (2.00 / 0) #9 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 02:34:42 AM EST
I dunno if it'll ever beat Partridge in my mind though. I love Partridge.

It's political correctness gone mad!

[ Parent ]
The trailer for next week by Phage (2.00 / 0) #12 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 02:50:13 AM EST
Looks promising. The petrolhead discussion, and his statement that he's more into the 'art' of cars. Classic.

Saxondale is a hundred dodgy twats I've met before. I can still hear statements like 'round-case 750ss desmodronics was the height of valve technology'.

[ Parent ]
did you see that figo headbutt? by alprazolam (4.00 / 1) #13 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 03:57:26 AM EST
However, Portugal coach Luiz Felipe Scolari defended Figo.

He said: "Jesus said we should turn the other cheek, unfortunately, Figo is not Jesus Christ."

lol...anyway yea Engerland doesn't have anybody like Deco or Riquelme, but is that guy gonna show up if you sit Beckham?

I think it's pretty lame to bash the guy who scores the game winner and I agree that you should play him for 70 or so and consider subbing him out. Also I think part of the reason they looked slow was they (in particular Beckham) didn't seem quite used to Rooney (maybe he was even a little rusty at first). Portugal will be in trouble, missing two starters, captain (and goalie iirc) with yellows, Cristiano possibly hurt.

I wonder if they Portugese press bashes Figo for being slow.

There is an adage by MillMan (4.00 / 1) #19 Mon Jun 26, 2006 at 10:53:53 AM EST
from the single elimination, 64 team US college basketball tournament:

survive and advance.

Everybody still hates me in this city and I hate everybody.

He pukes, he scores | 19 comments (19 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback