Print Story Great Moments in "The Phantom Menace"
Star Wars
By tps12 (Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:11:28 AM EST) Star Wars, Phantom Menace, Qui-Gon, Obi-Wan, destroyer droids, negotiation (all tags)
Moment 1


Where are those destroyer droids?!

               QUI-GON
          Destroyer droids!

               OBI-WAN
          Offhand, I'd say this mission
          is past the negotiation stage.

< Forever is a long time coming. | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Great Moments in "The Phantom Menace" | 87 comments (87 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Why do people hate The Phantom Menace by georgeha (4.00 / 3) #1 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:13:04 AM EST
can you name a better blockbuster space opera dealing with a trade war?


All the cool kids hate George Lucas. by Lost In A Dream (4.00 / 1) #3 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:14:43 AM EST

I personally liked the film. And I didn't really even mind Jar-Jar all that much.

___________________________________
. . .What you want in a marriage is, something like that town in Pennsylvania that's built over a burning seam of coal.". -- ti dave

[ Parent ]
yes by tps12 (2.00 / 0) #12 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:41:13 AM EST
I think the conventional wisdom about Jar-Jar was in place way too quickly for most people to make honest assessments of the character. He irritated the snooty critics and the humorless nerds who'd waited in line for weeks to see the premiere, and by the time the vast majority of moviegoers got to see him for themselves, they already knew they were supposed to hate him.

[ Parent ]
conspiracy theory much? by alprazolam (4.00 / 1) #55 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:02:17 AM EST
maybe it had more to do with the fact that his character had no redeeming qualities whatsoever?

[ Parent ]
he has redeeming qualities! by tps12 (4.00 / 1) #61 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:37:32 AM EST
He acts as a proxy for the confused viewer. When stuff doesn't make sense (which, let's face it, is almost constantly), one of the other main characters needs to explain things to Jar-Jar in simple language. Then Jar-Jar's reaction tells you how you should feel about it.

A good example is when they decide to go back to Naboo, having only just fled there to escape attempts on the queen's life. If Jar-Jar weren't there rejoicing that "[he]sa going home," we'd be completely confused.

So, he's important for the movie itself, even if you don't like the character. As for the character, I guess that's a matter of taste. IMHO, he has some mildly amusing lines ("why were you exiled?" "Meesa...clumsy"), but he is really just a goofy cartoon, so I can see how he could get on your nerves.

And I didn't mean to sound conspiracy-ish. I just mean that people's impressions are shaped partly by their expectations, and the volume and content of press leading up to this movie meant that almost everyone who saw it had negative expectations for Jar-Jar before the lights dimmed.

[ Parent ]
Lotsa people gonna die? by Orion Blastar (4.00 / 1) #65 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 07:03:56 AM EST
Yeah, Jar-Jar delivers clue-by-fours to those watching the film that have no idea what is going on. Only a moron can help other morons figure out what is going on.

Jar Jar "Lotsa people gonna die Annie?"

Anakin "Yes, Jar Jar, wars usually do that sort of thing. By the way, I told you I don't like being called Annie."

Then Anakin whips out a lightsaber and cuts off Jar Jar's head, continuing his journey to the dark side of the force, and causing the whole audiance to cheer that Jar Jar finally died.


"I drank what?" - Socrates after drinking the Conium
[ Parent ]
hell-ooo by tps12 (2.00 / 0) #66 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 07:07:24 AM EST
That helps establish Anakin's cold, calculating nature.

Trust me, G-Lu doesn't put any line in there without an excellent reason.

[ Parent ]
Jar Jar served his purpose by Orion Blastar (2.00 / 0) #76 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 01:21:20 PM EST
we was a tool used to convince the Senate to give Senator Palpatine emergency powers to fight the clone war now, and then refuse to release that power and form the Empire later. After that, Jar Jar does not have much use left in the next movie. In other words, he is Bantha doodoo.

"I drank what?" - Socrates after drinking the Conium
[ Parent ]
But the reason is usually to sell more toys by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #81 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 08:45:18 PM EST
Ha!  Zing!

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
[ Parent ]
So he's like live recording LAUGH and CLAP signs? by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #80 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 08:43:36 PM EST
To tell sheep which way they're supposed to act?  Splendid, now it makes sense.

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
[ Parent ]
hm, good point by tps12 (2.00 / 0) #86 Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 12:29:47 AM EST
You may be the first person to note that Star Wars movies lack subtlety.

[ Parent ]
For an encore by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #87 Mon Mar 21, 2005 at 03:19:25 AM EST
I have discovered some apparently contradictory passages in the Holy Bible which I would be happy to bring to the attention of the appropriate authorities.

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
[ Parent ]
But he's not useful for the other characters by squigs (2.00 / 0) #84 Sat Mar 19, 2005 at 09:55:24 AM EST
But really he should have been able to do something.  Make him a decent mechanic, or a master general, or for that matter just make him a good cook.  Anything to justify him not being left on tattoine, or the first asteroid they got to.

[ Parent ]
Because hes a sellout not talent hack? by LinDze (4.00 / 1) #68 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 07:13:09 AM EST
And deserves a quick kick to the groin? Really, the first Star Wars ranged from ok, to good. But all the new ones are "Story? Direction? Hey, look its shiny!".

-Lin Dze
Arbeit Macht Frei
[ Parent ]
DuneArrakisDesertPlanet by Rogerborg (4.00 / 1) #79 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 08:42:07 PM EST
Tell me about your homeworld, georgha.

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
[ Parent ]
Funny, I remember it a little different. by Lost In A Dream (2.00 / 0) #2 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:13:49 AM EST

Wasn't Anakin the one that said, "Master, destroyers." Then they turned around, then Obi said his line?

___________________________________
. . .What you want in a marriage is, something like that town in Pennsylvania that's built over a burning seam of coal.". -- ti dave

Only if by ObviousTroll (2.00 / 0) #8 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:34:53 AM EST
he appeared to them in some sort of precognitive force illusion. He wasn't in the movie at this point.


[ Parent ]
Sorry. by Lost In A Dream (2.00 / 0) #20 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:10:20 AM EST

Wrong apprentice.

___________________________________
. . .What you want in a marriage is, something like that town in Pennsylvania that's built over a burning seam of coal.". -- ti dave

[ Parent ]
nope by tps12 (2.00 / 0) #9 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:34:54 AM EST
This is at the very beginning of the movie, long before we've even gotten to Naboo, much less Tatooine, where we first encounter Anakin.

[ Parent ]
See other comment. by Lost In A Dream (2.00 / 0) #21 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:10:38 AM EST

I mixed up movies and apprentices.

___________________________________
. . .What you want in a marriage is, something like that town in Pennsylvania that's built over a burning seam of coal.". -- ti dave

[ Parent ]
I'm going to go out on a limb... by Jave27 (4.00 / 2) #4 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:20:23 AM EST
and let the world know that I didn't hate, and actually kinda liked, The Phantom Menace...  I realize that I immediately lose geek points, and the die-hard zealots have killed for less than this admission, but I never thought it was a horrible debauchery of a movie.  I didn't like the edits of the original 3 to add new footage, but only because they just looked too different from the rest of the movie.

I thought some of Anakin's lines were poorly read in EP1, but overall, it was a decent movie in my opinion.  Not as good as the originals, but nothing will be.

Sorry to disappoint the zealot crowd.


"Beating up the homeless. It's cruel, but it's a good clean work-out and leaves you feeling winded and superior." - CheeseburgerBrown


Han shot first! by georgeha (4.00 / 4) #5 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:26:09 AM EST
I labeled my IP'd copy of ANH the crappy copy, becuase it's the copy where Han does not shoot first, greatly changing his character and making him a less believable ruffian.

The real Han Solo wouldn't wait for some bounty hunter to draw first and risk getting killed, the real Han is a badass. Fuck you Lucas.


[ Parent ]
In the next version from LucasFilm... by ti dave (4.00 / 1) #72 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 08:52:23 AM EST
Han petitions the Imperial Magistrate's Court for a restraining order against Greedo, then the Hutts file a massive SLAPP suit against Han, all of his past trading partners and the Corellian Embassy.

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]
I hate it relatively less than most by DesiredUsername (2.00 / 0) #6 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:27:50 AM EST
By which I mean I never thought the first 3 were all that great.

---
Now accepting suggestions for a new sigline
[ Parent ]
grrr by StackyMcRacky (4.00 / 1) #15 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:43:45 AM EST

I HATE the edits of the originals. They need to burn in hell.

I thought The Phantom Menace was OK. I didn't like Attack of the Clones at all



[ Parent ]
Did you send your 8x10's to Joss by georgeha (4.00 / 2) #16 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:45:15 AM EST
he's casting Wonder Woman.


[ Parent ]
HA! by StackyMcRacky (2.00 / 0) #18 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:56:57 AM EST

I'm going to be sooo upset if he picks SMG to be Diana! She's waaaay too short and scrawny. Lucy Lawless is the obvious choice, but probably too close to her other character.



[ Parent ]
Demi Moore? Gabrielle Reese? Reese by georgeha (2.00 / 0) #19 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:08:29 AM EST
Witherspoon? Sanrad Bulloc? I'm having trouble picturing just who I would like to see as Wonder Woman.

Ooh, wait, Sigourney Weaver! She kicked ass in Aliens.


[ Parent ]
Maybe by ucblockhead (2.00 / 0) #23 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:15:06 AM EST
Angelina Jolie?

It's gotta be someone who can fill out Lynda Carter's suit. Not many in Hollywood like that.
---
[ucblockhead is] useless and subhuman

[ Parent ]
Delta Burke? by ad hoc (4.00 / 1) #24 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:17:53 AM EST

--


[ Parent ]
How about that woman by DesiredUsername (2.00 / 0) #29 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:25:18 AM EST
that does those contact lens commercials? She's a little old, but I think she'd be perfect.

---
Now accepting suggestions for a new sigline
[ Parent ]
word is by StackyMcRacky (2.00 / 0) #37 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:40:38 AM EST

she'll be playing Queen Hippolyta



[ Parent ]
they're going to have to get an unknown by StackyMcRacky (2.00 / 0) #28 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:19:45 AM EST

that's all there is to it.



[ Parent ]
Do I know you? by ad hoc (4.00 / 1) #32 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:31:16 AM EST

--


[ Parent ]
why, i don't believe you do! by StackyMcRacky (2.00 / 0) #38 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:41:05 AM EST


[ Parent ]
Sandra Bullock? Gabrielle Reese? by houser2112 (4.00 / 1) #25 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:18:07 AM EST
WW is busty. No way they could (naturally) make a credible WW. :)

[ Parent ]
Sigourney as Wonderwoman by anonimouse (4.00 / 1) #31 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:31:08 AM EST
-1, small tits.

Suggestion: Catherine Zeta Jones?


Girls come and go but a mortgage is for 25 years -- JtL
[ Parent ]
brunette, boobs, beautiful by georgeha (4.00 / 1) #34 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:35:12 AM EST
I concur with Catherine Zeta-Jones.


[ Parent ]
maybe by StackyMcRacky (2.00 / 0) #39 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:42:26 AM EST


[ Parent ]
elisabeth rohm by tps12 (2.00 / 0) #27 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:18:38 AM EST
Or Emma Caulfield.

[ Parent ]
Holden's little sister? [nt] by MohammedNiyalSayeed (2.00 / 0) #62 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:39:22 AM EST

-
You can build the most elegant fountain in the world, but eventually a winged rat will be using it as a drinking bowl.
[ Parent ]
ClaudiaBlackClaudiaBlackClaudiaBlack by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #82 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 08:47:02 PM EST
I have no idea who they should cast ClaudiaBlackClaudiaBlackClaudiaBlack.

-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
[ Parent ]
Look by jump the ladder (3.75 / 4) #7 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:31:11 AM EST
There was really only one Star Wars film that wasn't unbearable to watch as an adult and that's Empire Strikes Back. The rest are kiddie fims.

Well, duh. by ObviousTroll (2.00 / 0) #10 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:36:34 AM EST
Of course they were kiddie films. That was (and is) the target audience.

The people who expect to be as blown away by TPM as they were by ANH need to first take enough drugs to regress to the age of six.


[ Parent ]
partially agree by tps12 (4.00 / 1) #11 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:37:05 AM EST
There are plenty of kiddie films I don't mind watching. The Star Wars movies are just some of them.

[ Parent ]
Blasphemy! by thenick (4.00 / 6) #13 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:41:16 AM EST
"Empire had the better ending. I mean, Luke gets his hand cut off, finds out Vader's his father, Han gets frozen and taken away by Boba Fett. It ends on such a down note. I mean, that's what life is, a series of down endings. All Jedi had was a bunch of Muppets."

 
----------------------------

"'Vengence is Mine', quoth Alvis. And then he shot the guy, right in the freaking face!"

[ Parent ]
hello by tps12 (4.00 / 4) #14 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:42:12 AM EST
Spoiler tags, people!

[ Parent ]
If you haven't seen Empire or Jedi yet... by thenick (4.00 / 5) #17 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 03:49:41 AM EST
You don't deserve spoiler tags.

 
----------------------------

"'Vengence is Mine', quoth Alvis. And then he shot the guy, right in the freaking face!"

[ Parent ]
+1 by Lost In A Dream (4.00 / 3) #22 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:13:12 AM EST

Clerks Reference.

___________________________________
. . .What you want in a marriage is, something like that town in Pennsylvania that's built over a burning seam of coal.". -- ti dave

[ Parent ]
what? by alprazolam (2.00 / 0) #56 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:05:23 AM EST
you didn't find the sexual tension and incestual relationship between the luke and leia adult enough?

[ Parent ]
ObGeek by yicky yacky (4.00 / 3) #26 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:18:22 AM EST

The thing is: The jedi have to use their lightsabres to repel every single 'bolt' fired at them, and they continue to do this whilst wisecracking through the most imposing situations. They only have to get it wrong once, and that's one dead space-monk. But it never seems to happen. Is it completely beyond the wits of the BadGuys to develop a droid / gun which fires at three different, non-colinear, triangulated points of the body simultaneously? Then they'd be screwed ...


----
Vacuity abhors a vacuum.
Well yeah, by hulver (2.00 / 0) #30 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:26:46 AM EST
But then it wouldn't be much of a film would it?
--
Cheese is not a hat. - clock
[ Parent ]
Oh, I don't know by yicky yacky (4.00 / 1) #33 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:31:46 AM EST

They'd just have to be more creative than rely on the fire-deflect modus operandi. Then again, maybe it's in the new one where all the jedi killed: Episode III: The Empire do geometry.


----
Vacuity abhors a vacuum.
[ Parent ]
Yes! by Canthros (4.00 / 3) #35 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:35:29 AM EST
Lightsaber blades actually attract the blaster bolts, you see.

--
I'm not here, man.


[ Parent ]
consider by tps12 (4.00 / 3) #36 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:37:12 AM EST
They are not just reacting to the laser bolts, but anticipating them. It is physically impossible to hit a professionally thrown fastball (or something), but people still do it, even without Jedi Magic.

[ Parent ]
It's not a question of reaction times by DesiredUsername (4.00 / 1) #40 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:47:49 AM EST
It's a question of geometry. Three non-colinear points are headed towards you (with the normal of the plane being directly along the path of flight). You need to block all three with a line. Un. Possible.

---
Now accepting suggestions for a new sigline
[ Parent ]
not ***UN***possible by tps12 (4.00 / 4) #41 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 04:58:44 AM EST
You don't have to block them simultaneously. If you have

bolts          -->          lightsaber
  -----                         |
                                |
  -----                         |
|                               |
| -----                         |
y
 x---

(those are all on different z planes), then you can tilt the lightsaber forward to block one of them:

                      ----O\
                            \
                      -----  \
|                             \
|                     -----    \
y
 x---

and then bring it back to block the next two:

                                |
                                |
                           ----O|
|                               |
|                          ----O|
y
 x---

(lightsaber not parallel with y axis at this point).

[ Parent ]
Ghetto 7 by yicky yacky (4.00 / 1) #43 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:03:48 AM EST

just for the effort.

How about thirteen different bolts? ;)


----
Vacuity abhors a vacuum.
[ Parent ]
Well, geometry AND physics by DesiredUsername (2.00 / 0) #44 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:10:58 AM EST
Your method requires the lightsaber to either be really, really long or move faster than light.

---
Now accepting suggestions for a new sigline
[ Parent ]
i don't think so by tps12 (2.00 / 0) #46 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:20:23 AM EST
You can see the "laser bolts" moving; they don't go that fast.

[ Parent ]
That's just a special effect by DesiredUsername (4.00 / 1) #48 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:25:24 AM EST
The real laser bolts are light speed.

---
Now accepting suggestions for a new sigline
[ Parent ]
i don't think so. by rmg (4.00 / 2) #47 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:25:16 AM EST
i believe tps12's argument holds water. for one thing, the light sabre is not a solid object, but rather a projection of energy constantly being emitted from the handle. there's no reason such a thing could not "move" faster than the speed of light. shadows can "move" faster than the speed of light too.

additionally, there is no reason to suppose the blasters in star wars shoot lasers, as in the movies, it's quite clear that the bursts of energy do not travel at the speed of light. in fact, they probably move slower than bullets from the look of them (a hypothesis that should seem plausible to anyone who's watched video footage of the jfk shooting a few times).




[t]rolling retards conversation, period.

[ Parent ]
Yes, you have a point by DesiredUsername (4.00 / 4) #50 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:27:37 AM EST
With the mitochloridians and this post, both lightsaber usage and Jedi mind powers are now on equally firm scientific footing.

---
Now accepting suggestions for a new sigline
[ Parent ]
What the... by Jave27 (2.00 / 0) #53 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:44:02 AM EST
That was a well thought-out post, not a common troll...  I'm ashamed of you, rmg.

"Beating up the homeless. It's cruel, but it's a good clean work-out and leaves you feeling winded and superior." - CheeseburgerBrown


[ Parent ]
Like light, information has a dual nature. by dmg (4.00 / 3) #73 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 09:16:34 AM EST
That was a well thought-out post, not a common troll.

It seems you are unaware of the 'quantum' nature of troll postings. Just as light has a wave/particle duality, certain posts can appear as 'trolls' or 'well thought out' depending on the observer.

Hence the phenomenon known as "Trolling with the Truth" - one of a number of techniques which are well documented elsewhere.
--
dmg - HuSi's most dimwitted overprivileged user.

[ Parent ]
Consider me trolled in advance ... by yicky yacky (2.00 / 0) #58 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:11:37 AM EST

How do shadows "move" faster than light, oh rambin' mushroom geezer?


----
Vacuity abhors a vacuum.
[ Parent ]
Easy. by spcmanspiff (2.00 / 0) #64 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:49:53 AM EST
Light source and object are close together... big plane for observation is far away.

For each motion of the object, its projected shadow will "move" a much greater distance.

There's nothing I can think of that prevents the leading edge of that shadow from moving at any speed at all.

[ Parent ]
Yeah by DesiredUsername (2.00 / 0) #67 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 07:12:07 AM EST
This example is a lot better than the "scissor" one I read about a few years ago.

The real ticket to understanding this is to realize that if there were civilizations living on the screen the shadow is projected on, they can't use the superluminal shadow to transmit information, which is the real Einsteinian limitation.

Yep, microscopic civilizations and the word "superluminal" is definitely the clearest way to explain this.

---
Now accepting suggestions for a new sigline

[ Parent ]
I don't think so by martingale (2.00 / 0) #85 Sat Mar 19, 2005 at 10:25:25 PM EST
Remember that the Jedi are themselves constantly moving. So you have to do the calculation in the Jedi's frame of reference, where some of the plasma shots are shorter than others. You've confused by classical physics, which operates at much lower speeds than the monks are capable of (case in point: Yoda's sabre fight).
--
$E(X_t|F_s) = X_s,\quad t > s$
[ Parent ]
Don't think that works by Canthros (4.00 / 1) #49 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:27:12 AM EST
Blaster bolts are established to move at speeds well below that of light (or sound, probably!), but I think that you'd probably find yourself stuck cutting at least one in half -- something that worked okay for samurai with arrows, but not so well for what must be blobs of high energy plasma.

That said, if the bolts were not fired simultaneously, or were fired from different enough distances, you might be in good shape.

Alternatively, it could be that those of us involved in this discussion are attempting to subject to serious physical and thematic analysis something that has all the depth of a rain puddle.

--
I'm not here, man.


[ Parent ]
+1 Insightful by Jave27 (4.00 / 1) #52 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:43:04 AM EST
but -1 Condescending.

:-P


"Beating up the homeless. It's cruel, but it's a good clean work-out and leaves you feeling winded and superior." - CheeseburgerBrown


[ Parent ]
Condescending? by Canthros (2.00 / 0) #60 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:35:58 AM EST
Is it my fault that you idiots don't recognise my obvious jenious?

--
I'm not here, man.


[ Parent ]
Your jenious apparently doesn't apply to puddles by Jave27 (4.00 / 1) #69 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 07:24:54 AM EST
What is being discussed here has very obvious immense consequences to our lives, livelihood, mental and emotional well-being.  To equate such a monumental discussion to a mere rain puddle only demonstrates that you, yourself, are wearing very thick blinders in that you can't comprehend or fathom the depths of this conversation's effects.  I appreciate your additions to said conversation but am deeply offended that you consider this to be unimportant, when, in fact, this thread may be the most crucial item we face as a global society.

Amen.


"Beating up the homeless. It's cruel, but it's a good clean work-out and leaves you feeling winded and superior." - CheeseburgerBrown


[ Parent ]
*fingers in ears* by Canthros (4.00 / 1) #75 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 12:19:03 PM EST
LA LA LA I'M NOT LISTENING TO YOU!

--
I'm not here, man.


[ Parent ]
I don't know. by Lost In A Dream (4.00 / 1) #54 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:51:01 AM EST

I've seen some pretty fricken' deep rain puddles.

___________________________________
. . .What you want in a marriage is, something like that town in Pennsylvania that's built over a burning seam of coal.". -- ti dave

[ Parent ]
True. by Canthros (2.00 / 0) #59 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:33:02 AM EST
But they weren't written and directed by George Lucas is all I'm saying.

--
I'm not here, man.


[ Parent ]
Resident Evil Style by CrocoStimpy (2.00 / 0) #74 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 09:25:35 AM EST
The next bolt spreads out into a rotating mesh.  I hope you like your Jedi cube-steak style.

[ Parent ]
I'm ashamed of the whole lot of you by Bob Abooey (4.00 / 5) #42 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:02:46 AM EST
~nt~

Warmest regards,
--Your best pal Bob

Agreed by spacejack (4.00 / 3) #45 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:11:45 AM EST
Either that or trolling has gotten WAY out of control on Husi.

[ Parent ]
Yeah by Bob Abooey (4.00 / 3) #51 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:36:26 AM EST
I've been out of the trolling game for a while now, so maybe this is some kind of new sick twisted trolling method that I'm not aware of.

Boy, if that's the case then I fear for the safety of the Internet.

Warmest regards,
--Your best pal Bob

[ Parent ]
I would like to announce by Evil Cloaked User (4.00 / 1) #57 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:08:01 AM EST
That I've never seen any of the original starwars films.

well by tps12 (4.00 / 1) #63 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 06:46:11 AM EST
Now you have one sweet image and a dozen awesome words demonstrating why you've missed out.

And sixty comments demonstrating why you haven't.

[ Parent ]
Right. by Lost In A Dream (4.00 / 2) #70 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 07:46:22 AM EST

Please have your desk cleared out by quitting time. Don't bother expecting your last pay check. And consider yourself lucky we aren't turning you into the technothorities.

___________________________________
. . .What you want in a marriage is, something like that town in Pennsylvania that's built over a burning seam of coal.". -- ti dave

[ Parent ]
Now that takes skill by cam (4.00 / 1) #71 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 08:42:09 AM EST
if I could lie like that I could rule the world!

cam
Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic

[ Parent ]
It's no lie by Evil Cloaked User (2.00 / 0) #77 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 01:24:05 PM EST
I'd have a witty follow-up to go with that if I wasn't so drunk.

[ Parent ]
Yeh well by cam (4.00 / 1) #78 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 05:15:07 PM EST
In fellowed tankdom, "Your mum"

cam
Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic

[ Parent ]
You need to do the background reading by Rogerborg (2.00 / 0) #83 Fri Mar 18, 2005 at 08:56:38 PM EST
Required reading at the Imperial Academy.

Unanswered questions:



-
Metus amatores matrum compescit, non clementia.
Great Moments in "The Phantom Menace" | 87 comments (87 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback