Print Story Single.
Diary
By dev trash (Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 05:09:09 PM EST) (all tags)
Today was a good day.  I didn't have to use my AK.  man I love that song, for some reason, even though I'm no where close to being a gangsta.  And hey I guess it's kind apropos to mention AK-47s, what with the assault weapons ban expiring and all.


In a move that spins my head, and has the pea soup rushing up my food tube, John Kerry stated that he's a hunter and a gun owner, but he's for the assault weapons ban. He has a point.  No one uses assault weapons to hunt.  But.  If the time ever came that we as a population had to overthrow a government a la The British, some would say that having an assault weapon would even the odds a bit.  Of course, I don't think that would happen in my lifetime or even my kids lifetime.  I hate slippery slope arguments as much as the next guy but hey a ban here and a ban there and we'd be left with no legal means to own a gun.

As is per the normal here in the US, the office of the President ( as opposed to the actual person ) is getting all the slack for this thing expiring.  Bush may be lying when he says he'd sign an extension, but he's at least come on the record to say he would.  It's Congress who.has failed.  I'm starting to not like these '10 year and it expires' type laws.

This past week's "This American Life" was pretty cool.  It was 4 stories on the majority party in the US ( which is the Republicans ).  What struck me as odd is that according to Ira, the Republicans are more tolerant of dissenters in the party than the Democrats are in their party.  They example was Casey and his banning from the DNC convention because he was a pro-lifer.  Pretty much it solidifies my belief that nothing is black or white.  take me for example.  I'm more of a fiscal Conservative than a social one.  Don't get the whole religious right wing of the party.  Cut my taxes though and I'm happy.


I was monitored at work today.  Which should have put me at ease.  But they can do remote monitoring now.  I was totally surprised and pissing myself when my boss told me to log out and come to her desk.  But it was all okay.  My number for the 10 minute monitoring period were in line with my monthly stats, and the calls she heard were all good, I didn't give the wrong number nor was I rude ( I haven't never been verbally rude, perhaps I press the release button a little to quickly or slowly at times but never verbally rude. ).  I asked a question about one of the calls I remembered taking, and she seemed to like that I was trying to improve on what I was doing.  I was commended for going the extra mile on one call, by verifying the data to be texted.  That's not something I do all the time but did it this time on a whim.  If I can make it to 6 months and then to permanent status, I'll be a little less stressed out about things.

I picked up an application to get a monthly parking pass for the city lot.  Sure the gal who I chat with at lunch only pays a dollar ( and we come in at the same time, usually. ) but I have been hit with $2 charges the last 3 times ( which is the correct price. ) and since I'd have to park 4-5 times a week in that lot, it's cheaper to get a $33 parking pass for the month.

I've got three little projects running in my mind right now.  1.  Does my car's radio have an AUX in and how do I find it, if it does.  2.  Can i build a car PC to play my mp3s and stuff ( related to AUX in ) instead of burning CDs.  3.  Where is my OBD-II port and can I interface with that as well.

Oh wait, 4 projects, I am thinking on a new PC here soon.  Too.


I am off tomorrow, so I'm already quite busy.  Shopping, hair cut, laundry, maybe sell the car.  Reading.  Catch up on DVDs.  Code.  Maybe.


I so need to ask cute gal J out.  I was looking for a spot to log in today and I walked past her and she smiled at me and gave me this cute little wave.

< How much money for you to kill a puppy? | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Single. | 44 comments (44 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
Oh, bullshit. by ti dave (3.00 / 0) #1 Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 09:42:07 PM EST
An SKS makes a fine hunting rifle.

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs



For a broad definition of 'hunting' by zantispam (3.00 / 0) #11 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 02:11:53 AM EST
:-)

-- no sig
[ Parent ]

for a bad hunter yeah. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #24 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:58:48 AM EST
Try to kill that deer from 200 yards with just a recurve bow and arrow.  Now that's huntin.

--
Click
[ Parent ]

Look by jump the ladder (3.00 / 0) #2 Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 09:51:11 PM EST
If you wanna overthrow the govt you need more than assualt weapons. Howabout RPGs, Stingers, laser-guided bombs



Yes? Those can be obained quite easily. by ti dave (3.00 / 0) #3 Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 10:26:56 PM EST
You know what? There are a lot of veterans, in your country and mine, who know how to obtain those items and are quite capable of doing so.

I would even surmise that many of them have mentally rehearsed the scenarios.

If worse comes to worst, a civil war in either country would be quite a bloody affair.

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]

Dunno by jump the ladder (3.00 / 0) #4 Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 10:30:16 PM EST
How bad would it have to get? You guys have been pretty stoical under pretty shit govts of both centre-right (Usian = liberal) and right wing govts.

[ Parent ]

How bad? by ti dave (3.00 / 0) #19 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:25:18 AM EST
Think "Scouring of teh Shire" bad.

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]

Just check the scrap metal market by lm (3.00 / 0) #13 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 02:30:23 AM EST
A good deal of the scrap metal sold to Jordan by Iraqi salvagers contains such lovely items as engines for cruise missles.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Revolutions by nebbish (3.00 / 0) #5 Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 10:37:28 PM EST
There's no reason why America shouldn't do them the same way as everyone else, and get the army on the side of the people.

Always strikes me as funny conservatives saying we need to keep guns so we can have a people's revolution in the future.

--------
It's political correctness gone mad!


You mean. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #23 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:55:42 AM EST
Like when we broke away from Britain and got the British Army on our side?

--
Click
[ Parent ]

congress by tps12 (3.00 / 0) #6 Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 11:15:27 PM EST
If you look at how the AWB was passed the first time around, responsibility really does lie with the president. Even with the Democratic Congress, Clinton had to fight hard to get it passed, because the NRA was telling legislators that it would fund their opponents if they voted for it (which it did, contributing to the 94 Republican Revolution). I'm not exactly surprised that Bush isn't doing the same thing, as it's hardly his kind of issue (no big businesses involved), but the political opportunism of his shrugging his shoulders and putting on the moderate centrist act is pretty pathetic to anyone who was paying attention between the 2000 RNC and the last one.

On the law itself, I wouldn't care one way or the other, except that cops seem to back the ban pretty strongly. I'll give the pigs the benefit of the doubt. Your point about revolution is well taken, but I'm afraid I would disagree with the kinds of people likely to maintain private arsenals on what kind of government misbehavior would justify revolution and on what should replace it afterward.

I also liked the TAL episode, but the Casey thing is just wrong...he was not allowed to speak in '92 because he wasn't endorsing Clinton, not because he was pro-life. There was a pro-life speaker at this year's DNC, but I forget who.



Are you sure? by lm (3.00 / 0) #12 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 02:28:30 AM EST
Ryan Zempel reports that there were two pro-life speakers at the Democratic convention. One was US representative James Langevin, who introduced Ron Reagan Jr.'s speech on supporting embryonic stem cell research, which arguably doesn't place him firmly in the pro-life camp. Another was an unnamed Democratic that wishes her beliefs with regards to being pro-life to be private. I'm not certain that this is a very good example of inclusivism for dissent.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

yes by tps12 (3.00 / 0) #14 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 02:51:03 AM EST
James Langevin is pro-life. You may not think he's pro-life enough, but he is consistent in voting against the party line on abortion.

[ Parent ]

Being anti-abortion is not pro-life by lm (6.00 / 1) #15 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 03:03:29 AM EST
Which is my big gripe against the Republican party. Rather than actually having a `pro-life' platform, like they claim, they have an anti-abortion platform, and barely that. And even if being pro-life were the same as being anti-abortion, having a single pro-life speaker give an introduction for another speaker is not exactly a huge display of the DNC welcoming diversity.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

well by tps12 (3.00 / 0) #16 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 03:17:23 AM EST
I understand that you may have issues with the terminology (I do too!), but practically everybody understands the same thing by "pro-life" that Republicans and Langevin do.

Also, having Langevin speak was not intended to be any kind of display of the DNC's welcoming diversity. It did, however, happen, and as such stands as evidence that there is no pro-life blacklist at Democratic conventions.

[ Parent ]

I don't think so by lm (6.00 / 1) #18 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:10:05 AM EST
For example, the DFLA, among other parties, has a different understanding of the term than merely being anti-abortion. With regard to your second point, Langevin's speech only stands as evidence that there is no pro-life blacklist at the most recent Democratic National Convention.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

um by tps12 (3.00 / 0) #22 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:40:42 AM EST
This page of theirs seems to refer to Langevin using that language. But maybe you and I can just agree that he's "not pro-choice" and leave it at that.

Good point about now vs. then; I intended that as an additional point (pro-lifers are still not excluded from conventions), the Casey myth already having been debunked elsewhere.

[ Parent ]

Plzelaboratekthnx by ti dave (3.00 / 0) #20 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:32:29 AM EST
[na

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]

pro-life by lm (6.00 / 2) #27 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 09:04:59 AM EST
The traditional pro-life platform has been: anti-euthanasia, anti-capital punishment, anti-abortion, anti-cloning, anti-in vitro fertilization, anti-nuclear weapon, anti-suicide (and the assisted variation thereof), anti-poverty, anti-hunger, as well as, pro-life with regards to social programs, charitable giving, foreign aid, etc. in the words of Dorothy Day: We opened houses of hospitality for the poor, the hungry, the homeless, and for abused women and pregnant mothers. We practiced the spiritual and corporal works of mercy. Being pro-life is a duality, not only being against that which is pro-death, but also being for those things that create life. The Republican party, though, is most simply anti-abortion and they aren't really very serious about that. A truly anti-abortion party would seek to use public policy to reduce the number of abortions performed by shaping society in ways that would reduce the perceived need for abortions. As it is, the GOP mostly wants to simply ban the practice which will be as likely to stop abortions from being performed as prohibition stopped alcohol from being consumed.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

OK. Next question: by ti dave (3.00 / 0) #34 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:37:43 PM EST
How in the hell does cloning [creation of a new life] and in-vitro fertilisation [creation of a new life] offend some who is "pro-life"?

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]

Life begins at conception by lm (5.00 / 1) #37 Wed Sep 15, 2004 at 02:12:37 AM EST
It isn't a theoretical stance, but a practical stance. Current methods of cloning and in vitro fertilization require the destruction of many zygotes for each success.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

So... by ti dave (5.00 / 1) #38 Wed Sep 15, 2004 at 07:03:32 AM EST
when the techniques are perfected, they'll be fine with the [no pun intended] concepts?

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]

I would contend that that will largely be the case by lm (6.00 / 2) #39 Wed Sep 15, 2004 at 07:34:25 AM EST
I can't think of a good reason to include those types of technologies if they don't destroy many lives in the creation of a single life. That doesn't mean that someone might not think of one, but in principle, your inference is correct.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

Casey. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #25 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:59:02 AM EST
NPR/TAL aren't known for being republican strongholds, so I doubt they'd get something like Casey being barred from speaking, wrong,

--
Click
[ Parent ]

oh by tps12 (3.00 / 0) #29 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 09:26:34 AM EST
I assure you, they did get it wrong. Even the leftists at public radio can make mistakes. See the link in my thread with lm: other pro-life Democrats spoke at the 1992 convention.

[ Parent ]

cute gal J and assualt weapons by jimgon (3.00 / 0) #7 Mon Sep 13, 2004 at 11:46:46 PM EST
Yes. You do have to do that.

The assualt weapon ban as a placebo.  It was meant to do little and to make people feel better.  The gun manufacturers in most cases made small modifications to assualt weapons to get them around the legal definition and it was business as usual.  Politics isn't about doing things that are right or make people better, it's about making people think you are doing right and that they feel better.  Meanwhile you walk away with a load of contacts to make real money in your "retired" life.



eh by tps12 (5.00 / 1) #8 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 12:07:32 AM EST
That's a pretty extreme (though I'll grant, not entirely unjustified) amount of cynicism. Taking the view that all legislation consists of feel-good measures with no real-world impact sort of removes yourself from the discussion.

The ban was terribly politically charged, and only managed to get passed with the loopholes you mentioned inserted as a compromise. It could have been the first step toward stronger legislation, but the Republicans' control of the federal government (and the far right's control of the Republicans) ensure that it won't be.

[ Parent ]

Cynicism by jimgon (6.00 / 1) #9 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 12:32:52 AM EST
I agree, that was overly cynical even for me.

Ultimately I think the gun manufacturers found an easy way around the ban.  I don't think there was a good definition built into the law and I don't think there could be a good definition with out banning most sport rifles.  The only thing I can think of is banning firearms of certain caliber or rate of fire.  But I'm willing to bet there are legitimate sport rifles that have the same caliber and ROF as a lot of non-automatic assualt rifles. I think, short of an outright ban on firearms, these laws can only serve as a placebo. 

Massachusetts has something I firmly agree with.  Firearmm ownership licenses.  You want a firearm, fine, but you have to be licensed by police first.  I believe that it now requires taking a firearm safety course too.  I don't think banning firearms is the right approach, education is, but American don't like spending money to educate children never mind adults seeking weaponary.

[ Parent ]

HERE COMES BIG BROTHER! by ti dave (3.00 / 0) #21 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:35:17 AM EST
Yes, let's help him locate all of the gun owners. We wouldn't want to hinder the GestapoFeds now, would we?

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]

Drink the Kool Aid by jimgon (3.00 / 0) #28 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 09:06:39 AM EST
Then everything will be okay. 

[ Parent ]

OK. by ti dave (6.00 / 1) #35 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 08:40:01 PM EST
I'd like some of that "Mountain Blast" flavour, please.

I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The important question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. --W.S. Burroughs

[ Parent ]

I saw the police and they rolled right past me by metalfan (3.00 / 0) #10 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 01:13:25 AM EST
OBD-II Port: check under the seat first (easiest), then under the dash (underneath the steering wheel, where your knees go),  and if you still haven't found it, start going hunting under the hood.

Line in on your car stereo: front or back, duh :)

Oh dear, said God, I hadn't thought of that, and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.



ok. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #26 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 09:02:55 AM EST
So I assume it's in the back and I need to take it out of the dash to see for sure.

--
Click
[ Parent ]

Most likely by metalfan (3.00 / 0) #30 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 12:10:48 PM EST
If it's not a Ford, count your lucky stars.  If it is a Ford,  curse the bastards.

I say this because on newer Fords (the trucks I see at work, at least) removing the factory radio requires special tools.

Oh dear, said God, I hadn't thought of that, and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.

[ Parent ]

It's a Chevy. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #31 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 12:38:05 PM EST
Now if I can get a weekend day off I can have myself a project.

--
Click
[ Parent ]

What kind? by metalfan (3.00 / 0) #32 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 01:02:18 PM EST
If it's a truck, I know exactly how to get the dash apart.   If not, well..  you're on your own, but I doubt it's any harder.

Oh dear, said God, I hadn't thought of that, and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.

[ Parent ]

sorta a truck. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #33 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 04:01:15 PM EST
it's a '01 Chevy Tracker.

--
Click
[ Parent ]

Probably different by metalfan (3.00 / 0) #36 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 11:57:04 PM EST
On the Chev trucks all you have to do is pop out the dash piece (after tilting the wheel all the way down and putting the shifter into 1st, if it's an auto) that goes over the instrument panel/climate control panel,  and then take out 2 screws so you can pop out the piece under the steering wheel (if you need to).

Oh dear, said God, I hadn't thought of that, and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.

[ Parent ]

sounds easy. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #40 Wed Sep 15, 2004 at 02:41:27 PM EST
I am off Sunday, so I'll try.  Thanks for the info.

--
Click
[ Parent ]

Dunno if it's the same by metalfan (3.00 / 0) #41 Wed Sep 15, 2004 at 03:49:01 PM EST
I am having trouble picturing exactly what a Tracker looks like.

Oh dear, said God, I hadn't thought of that, and promptly vanished in a puff of logic.

[ Parent ]

A Chevy Tracker is really a Suzuki Vitara by lm (3.00 / 0) #42 Fri Sep 17, 2004 at 01:31:38 AM EST
Not all that long ago, Chevy used to use their Geo brand to sell Trackers. Now they go with the Chevy nameplate, but it's still a Suzuki underneath.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

This I know. by dev trash (3.00 / 0) #43 Fri Sep 17, 2004 at 03:43:38 AM EST
I just need to find out how to get to the headunit.

--
Click
[ Parent ]

Right by lm (3.00 / 0) #44 Fri Sep 17, 2004 at 06:02:00 AM EST
I was posting for the benefit of metalfan. I probably should have been a bit more explicit, but the `Chevy truck' way of getting to the head unit probably won't work on the Tracker because the Tracker is a Suzuki.

There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]

You're not going to overthrow the government... by ShadowNode (6.00 / 1) #17 Tue Sep 14, 2004 at 06:50:30 AM EST
With small arms, and hunting with guns is unsportsmanlike.



Single. | 44 comments (44 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback