Print Story Stuff
Diary
By sven (Wed May 12, 2004 at 05:30:30 PM EST) (all tags)
I can't think of anything to write here.

Inside: Holiday photos, aviation news, federal budget, work



Holiday photos

I'm slowly scanning in the photos from the holiday for uploading. They're now about 70% scanned and 25% uploaded. Photos from Britain and Ireland are here in approximately correct order. I still haven't started typing up my diary. I have, however, written about 75% of the trip report that I'll be posting to Flyertalk.

Aviation news

Lots of airlines are introducing a fuel levy for tickets after July 1, Qantas amongst them. Seems a bit sneaky to me. They should really increase ticket prices to reflect the increased costs, but by adding it as a levy it's hidden to some extent. It also means that it's passed on to those redeaming frequent flyer rewards. Luckily I have the honeymoon booked already, so they won't be making me pay. It's $6 per segment for domestic flights, $15 for international. If I was booking now, it would be adding an extra $54 per person to the taxes and charges. From memory that's about a 45% increase. Nasty.

This week the paint scheme and uniforms for the new low-cost airline Jetstar were released. The paint scheme looks ok, but the orange uniforms leave a bit to be desired. And here's some more in-depth analysis. My favourite quote: Once those characters start doing the safety demo the passengers will think it is some sort of '70's cabaret act.

Federal budget

Howard and Costello certainly have some interesting tactics. Sensationalised and possibly inaccurate highlights:

  • Tax cuts for people earning over $52,000 pa (ie not me)
  • $3000 for people who have babies after July 1
  • $600 cheques for people with kiddies, and another $600 next year
At first glance, sending people cheques for $600 certainly appears to be a good political tactic. I would quite happily vote for someone who gave me $600. If they're clever (questionable) they'll call the election soon after that second round of money goes out.

Restricting the tax cuts to high incoming earners seems a bit stupid though. Most of those would probably have voted Liberal anyway. Strangely, Costello kept referring to those who benefitted as "middle Australia". Bollocks. Last time I checked the average wage was about $42,000 pa.

They do seem very keen to promote the benefits for having kiddies. It's quite disturbing to hear Howard and Costello telling everyone to go home and "do their patriotic duty for Australia", "your country needs you", etc.

WA Labor Premier Geoff Gallop was predictably unimpressed with the budget. Didn't recognise WA's contribution, the battlers missed out, no relief for HECS debts, etc.

Work

I've been pleasantly busy recently. And there's a hint that my pay might be getting a "bump" (up presumably). It's all good.

< This is probably a dumb question | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Stuff | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
$600 for people with kids? by creo (6.00 / 3) #1 Wed May 12, 2004 at 07:22:17 PM EST
I must have missed that - what's the story?

Is it means tested? per kiddy? If so, I've got 1200 heading my way, for although I am non resident, Mrs C is not.

I don't know what the weather was like in Ireland for your hols, but the weather here (Helsinki) is superb now - lovely clear skys, and almost 20C.

I probably wont vote this time 'round as I'm not too sure what the story is with non residents, better check it out. If I can vote (hopefully), it will feel good taking Howards money while hopefully sending GWBs knob polishing dwarf to the retirement he so richly deserves.

Cheers
Creo.

"I shall do what I believe to be right and honourable" - Guderian


$600 and Irish weather by sven (6.00 / 1) #5 Thu May 13, 2004 at 12:02:57 PM EST
From the Budget Overview:
2003-04 lump sum payment to families
As well as the ongoing increase in FTB (A), all families receiving or eligible for FTB (A) in 2003-04 will receive an immediate lump sum payment of $600 per child. This will be paid to eligible families before 30 June 2004, at a cost of over $2 billion. Most families will receive $600 before 30 June 2004 and be eligible for a further $600 per child after their 2003-04 reconciliation of entitlement - an additional $1,200 per child over the next 12 months.

The weather in Ireland was pretty average. It was usually fine and sunny when we woke up, but the time we went out the clouds were coming over, and by mid-afternoon it was raining. I'm sure it's far nicer now.

The description of Howard as GWBs knob polishing dwarf is possibly the best description I have ever heard.

--
harshbutfair // you know it makes sense
[ Parent ]

Bummer by creo (6.00 / 2) #7 Thu May 13, 2004 at 10:08:11 PM EST
Although we technically make no Australian income (other than a few hundred dollars from share dividends) we probably do not qualify as Mrs C is out of the country with the kids for most of the year.

Might be worth following up when we come home in June for a couple of weeks. Thx for the info.

The description of Howard as GWBs knob polishing dwarf is possibly the best description I have ever heard.

Glad to be of service ....

Cheers
Creo.

"I shall do what I believe to be right and honourable" - Guderian
[ Parent ]

Tax breaks for having kids? by Breaker (6.00 / 2) #2 Wed May 12, 2004 at 10:42:48 PM EST
Won't someone tell your government that we've enough bar staff in the UK already?




Australian Ubermensch by cam (6.00 / 1) #3 Wed May 12, 2004 at 10:59:42 PM EST
It's quite disturbing to hear Howard and Costello telling everyone to go home and "do their patriotic duty for Australia", "your country needs you", etc.

Next they will be giving the money out based on eugenics. Nationalism sucks.

You took a lot of photos of castles and churches, the very old buildings.

cam
Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic


Photos by sven (6.00 / 1) #6 Thu May 13, 2004 at 12:21:50 PM EST
You took a lot of photos of castles and churches, the very old buildings.

I can't help it! It's the most obvious difference between Australia and Europe.

--
harshbutfair // you know it makes sense
[ Parent ]

By the way. by ambrosen (6.00 / 1) #4 Wed May 12, 2004 at 11:04:41 PM EST
I think photo 25 is of the Palace of Holyroodhouse, not Edinburgh Castle. It's possible I'm wrong, but I'm fairly sure: it's not on a hill for starters. Also, one of the views of the castle is mainly of Ramsey Street Gardens. Not that that matters. Glad you had a good trip.



You're half right by sven (3.00 / 0) #8 Fri May 14, 2004 at 03:05:29 PM EST
You're correct that it isn't Edinburgh Castle. It isn't the Palace of Holyroodhouse either. It's not even in Scotland! Oops! The winner is Kilkenny Castle. I've updated the description now.

Well spotted!

--
harshbutfair // you know it makes sense
[ Parent ]

Stuff | 8 comments (8 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback