Print Story Do you fight for the users?
Diary
By BlueOregon (Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 03:57:17 PM EST) (all tags)
Flynn, are you embezzling?
"Embezzling" is such an ugly word, Mr. Bradley

Dicke...
Na Du fette Sau!



Ich bin froh
Daß ich kein Dicker bin
Denn Dicksein ist 'ne Quälerei
Ich bin froh
Daß ich so'n dünner Hering bin
Denn dünn bedeutet frei zu sein

Well, perhaps not yet, but I'm sure I'll get there. A few colleagues are fond of asking whether I've lost weight, and I always tell them "no." Then they say my face looks thinner, but that's probably in comparison with last spring, since whenever I travel to Europe I walk/hike enough to lose a bit, and I probably kept my face slender enough from then. If I develop a double chin, I'd just do the fat-cutting work myself.

I refuse to get a scale. I do not really want to know my *weight* ... I'll just be happy when the gut is gone and pants with a 36" waist are too big. I'll probably have to break 200lbs, though, for that.

[...]
Für Dicke gibt's nix anzuziehen
Dicken sind zu dick zum fliehen
Dicke haben schrecklich dicke Beine
Dicke ham'n Doppelkinn
Dicke schwitzen wie die Schweine
[...]

terpia's comment last week inspired me to buy some of the Yogi Tea that my brother is so fond of drinking. Now, I like "good for you" stuff as much as the next person, but I'm also a skeptical little bastard, and frankly the so-called 'health benefits' leave me unconvinced (note their own fine print: "*These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease."), but I can say this: their Peach DeTox tea == TEH TASTY, so I do recommend it.

Dicken haben Blähungen
Dicke ham'n dicken Po
Und von den ganzen Abführmitteln
rennen Dicke oft auf's Klo

The following brownie recipe proved to be rather popular:

  • 2 eggs
  • 3/4 cup sugar
  • 1 tsp. vanilla extract
  • 1/2 cup butter (melted)
  • 3/4 cup sweetened cocoa powder (e.g. Ghirardelli)
  • 2/3 cup unsifted flour
  • 1/4 tsp. baking powder
  • 1/4 tsp. salt

(a cup of chocolate chips or 1/2 cup of walnuts are optional; I chose neither, see below). Preheat oven to 350(F) and grease pan. Stir eggs, vanilla, and sugar; add butter. In a separate bowl mix flour, baking powder, salt, and cocoa. Stir two mixtures together, pour into pan, and bake for about 25 minutes (20-30 depending on desired chewiness and such). I added about a 1/2 cup of sliced almonds to the mixture.

These brownies are quite sweet, and I might cut down on the sugar a tad in the future. In addition, as mentioned elsewhere, cayenne pepper is a wonderful addition to brownies. 1/4 tsp. will leave a lingering aftertaste; for more of a kick I recommend about 1 tsp. per batch. If you keep it mild, it will remind you a bit of cinnamon or anise.

At Kaffeestunde yesterday only one student showed up -- same student of mine who was there last time. Well, this way she gets plenty of one-on-one time with the various TAs. Furthermore we had six boxes of Girl Scout cookies (and the two batches of brownies), since the main dept. secretary ordered them -- 3 for us, and 3 for home, but her husband said "don't bring them home", so she gave us the other 3 boxes, too. And for once, I was not the one to make the silly joke about whether or not my brownies were made with real Brownies (given the boxes of Girl Scout cookies there ...).

[...]
Und ham sie endlich zehn Pfund abgenommen
Ja dann kann man es noch nichtmal sehn
Dicke ham's so schrecklich schwer mit Frauen
Denn Dicke sind nicht angesagt
[...]

I did not make it to bed until about 4:30am because I had to write a bibliography for my dissertation advisor; we had a meeting this afternoon about 12:45. I and several colleagues dread such meetings -- our advisor is great and such, but a bit of a perfectionist, so we always feel that unless it is perfect, we can't hand in anything ... meaning it is difficult to progress and actually *do* anything. Anyway, the meeting went well. We also discussed my new timeline; I need to get him a chapter by the end of May, and another by the end of August. I am not traveling this summer, so it *should* be possible ... all depends on my level of motivation, I suppose.

As an aside: I found a book that looks wonderfully interesting, and relevant to my work: Essays on Nonconceptual Content, edited by York H. Gunther. One of the dominant trends in criticism and such, due to 1) generalization and overapplication of Whorf-Sapir, 2) belief in everything being ideology- and discourse-bound (see post-structuralism and related 'things'), and 3) the 'linguistic-turn' .... three things that are closely related, but not identical ... is a focus on language being the locus of thought. One of the questions is: do we / can we have 'thoughts' or 'knowledge' that do not rely on language, or more generally are non-semiotic in nature? Actually, those two need not be so closely connected, especially not in a set-->sub-set sort of way (one might take Kantian 'ideas' as having a non-semiotic aspect since they are non-conceptual, but then you get into the whole self-referential and 'free-signifier' stuff). Anyway, as I stated, this is merely an aside for today.

To conclude: Bring in the logic probe!

< Spring break sucked | BBC White season: 'Rivers of Blood' >
Do you fight for the users? | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback
I did not get ti sleep till 3 by joh3n (3.00 / 0) #1 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 04:26:22 PM EST
because of the MCP!

Don't make me de-res you, BIOTCH.

And contrary to popular belief I don't like to spend all of my time watching gay porn
-theantix



Dude by MisterQueue (6.00 / 1) #4 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 09:34:36 PM EST
you let a Microsoft Certified Professional make you lose sleep?

Man that's weak.


------------
"The fact that our site admin is a lovable drunken troll makes me giggle." -MillMan
[ Parent ]

I suppose I could understand it ... by BlueOregon (6.00 / 1) #11 Wed Mar 10, 2004 at 01:32:41 AM EST

... if she were cute or something. You know, proper hat, love for PBR, and a pie fetish ... but do such MCPs exist?

Thus I conclude: yeah, pretty weak.

_
I mean, can't she just be stupid about *men*?
[ Parent ]

No by hulver (5.00 / 1) #2 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 08:30:48 PM EST
I fight with the users.
--
Cheese is not a hat. - clock


On a tangent to the by Metatone (3.00 / 0) #3 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 08:42:30 PM EST
langauge as locus of thought thing...

If there is "knowledge" existing that has language describing it, but it is wrong, is it possible to correct that knowledge without changing the language?

Further, how does this process occur in an individual who overturns some "knowledge" without outside aid?

Just speculative thoughts...



Linguistic knowledge by Dr H0ffm4n (3.00 / 0) #8 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 10:31:09 PM EST
I'm always puzzled by this debate as it appears to be a self-referencing semantic squabble. Is there knowledge without language? Well, I can learn how to do things (e.g. ride a bike) without being told how. Also I can be told how to ride a bike but still not be able to do it. Some of the knowledge of bike riding is simply not linguistic.

The question of whether thought is totally linguistic (symbolic, whatever...) in nature is one of definition in my view. If I say all thought is linguistic in nature, then any mental manipulation of knowledge that is not linguistic (call it intuitive if you like) is simply not thought.

[ Parent ]

Well, I have to agree... by Metatone (3.00 / 0) #13 Wed Mar 10, 2004 at 05:09:32 AM EST
It's not a debate of interest in it's pure state. I think it's mostly of interest with reference to a couple of questions :

  • Does significant control of language (through media, culture, etc.) imply significant control of thought?

  • To what degree is it possible for two seperate cultures (with different languages) to come up with "thoughts" that cannot be translated?


[ Parent ]

Answers by Dr H0ffm4n (3.00 / 0) #14 Wed Mar 10, 2004 at 06:14:22 AM EST
  1. Yes
  2. Dolphins?


[ Parent ]

Write in by Dr H0ffm4n (5.00 / 1) #5 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 09:50:48 PM EST
I am male and detest TRON. It's complete bollocks.



Write In. by ana (5.00 / 1) #6 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 10:02:15 PM EST
TRON wasn't invented when I was a kid.

"And this ... is a piece of Synergy." --Kellnerin


yes, but ... by BlueOregon (3.00 / 0) #10 Wed Mar 10, 2004 at 01:30:46 AM EST

... were you a kid at heart?

_
I mean, can't she just be stupid about *men*?
[ Parent ]

3/4 cup sugar to 2 eggs!! :-o by fritz the cat (3.00 / 0) #7 Tue Mar 09, 2004 at 10:27:41 PM EST
These brownies are quite sweet
The understatement of the year! No wonder you have no intention to get yourself scales... ;-)

[Ed.: currently a dormant account - posting on behalf of extremely tedious HuSer]


not quite ... by BlueOregon (3.00 / 0) #9 Wed Mar 10, 2004 at 01:29:54 AM EST

... not overly sweet by any means ... just sort of high-octane-brownies. Plus, I didn't eat them =)
(they were for coffee hour in the dept., so I made them for others; I just tasted a crumb)

_
I mean, can't she just be stupid about *men*?
[ Parent ]

I fight the users. by MohammedNiyalSayeed (3.00 / 0) #12 Wed Mar 10, 2004 at 02:44:20 AM EST

Damn users. Always wanting things.

I AM SYSADMIN! HEAR ME ROAR! OR SEE YOUR SESSION GET DISCONNECTED!


-
You can build the most elegant fountain in the world, but eventually a winged rat will be using it as a drinking bowl.


INVALID TRON SYNTAX by joh3n (6.00 / 1) #15 Wed Mar 10, 2004 at 06:51:13 AM EST
the term is 'de-resed'

yessh.

And contrary to popular belief I don't like to spend all of my time watching gay porn
-theantix

[ Parent ]

Do you fight for the users? | 15 comments (15 topical, 0 hidden) | Trackback