Print Story The Division Bell
By Anonymous (Thu May 22, 2008 at 10:24:11 AM EST) (all tags)



Product Image
The Division Bell - Pink Floyd

Our price: $6.24

A Masterpiece .. what else could this be ? = )

Im the sentimental kind . I remember spring of 1994 , working on a paint crew , and enjoying this excellent album in my truck's stereo before and after work . And , the awesome experience of seeing the band in Ames IA - Cyclone stadium - in June 1994 .

I was 19 , and it brings all sorts of beautiful memories of my hard earned life . Especially that year ( It's like that for most = ) ]

Ive heard hard reviews against this album , as well as positive , constructive views of its atributes . My father took me to my first PF concert in 1988 in Cedar Falls , IA ( our hometown ] . So , my Floyd palate has a strong Gilmourish base . Although years down the road ( at 25 years old ] i discovered , the ' other ' side of The Floyd - Piper .. , Saucerful .., Atom heart .., Obscured by clouds . Basically all of the strong ' progressive ' output from the late 60s and 70 s .

This band has such an incredible catalog . They leave me w out words , really . As i write this , i remember sitting in a lawn area , at the opposite end zone of Cyclone stadium , kicking back on the grass ( it was such an excellent and cheap seat = ) ) and seeing the sunset , the laser lights and ' One of these days ' blasting through the June Iowa night


A surprisingly fine return to form

When I picked this album up upon its release in 1994, I had not purchased a new Pink Floyd album since the time of The Final Cut. I was very pleasantly surprised with The Division Bell however, and the 1980s textures of Momentary Lapse of Reason were nowhere to be found. Indeed, although very modern sounding, references to their most popular albums released during the 1973-1979 timeframe are scattered across The Division Bell, along with fine songwriting and playing.

The instrumentation is classic Floyd and bits of analog sounding synthesizers and Hammond organ, along with acoustic and clean sounding electric guitars dominate the soundscape. I also noted that Dave (his playing is very tasteful throughout) uses what sounds like a guitar synthesizer of sorts, which yields an unnaturally high pitched guitar tone. It is pretty cool sounding. Dave's voice is in excellent condition and has changed very little since the time of Pink Floyd's "golden age". Rick Wright also makes a brief appearance on vocals too. My favorite tracks include the atmospheric instrumental pieces, although the vocal tracks are also very good.

This is a deeply personal album, with Gilmour taking on topics of his (at the time) recently failed marriage, the strained relationship with former member (bassist) Roger Waters, and the (late) Syd Barrett. The lyrics are pretty good; most of which were written by Dave and his girlfriend.

Overall, while very polished and modern sounding, this is a surprisingly fine return to form and should appeal to most fans of the older material.


A satisfying going-away present

Of the two post-Roger Waters studio albums made by Pink Floyd, this is clearly the superior effort. David Gilmour and Bob Ezrin were trying very hard to replicate 70s Floyd on Momentary Lapse, but Division Bell is a more satisfying and relaxed effort. Only a few moments ("Keep Talking", "What Do You Want From Me") consciously mimic earlier Floyd efforts.

Overall, the sound of this album echoes the more collective Floyd sound in the early 70s rather than the Waters-driven visions of the late 70s. There's a more modern sound, but much of the stuff here sounds like it could have cropped up on Obscured by Clouds, Meddle or Atom Heart Mother. Rick Wright makes a welcome return as a composer, contributing to approximately half the songs.

The best parts of the album lie in the beginning (the two instrumentals, "Poles Apart") and the end ("Keep Talking", "Lost for Words", "High Hopes"). The U2-ish "Take It Back" and "Coming Back to Life" are probably too upbeat and poppy for many Floyd fans, but quite enjoyable in their own right. The two duds are the bland "A Great Day for Freedom" and the turgid "Wearing the Inside Out".

One last word - if nothing else, check out "High Hopes" - a Floyd classic, one of the best tunes in the Floyd canon. Maybe this album doesn't match the heights of Floyd's best work in the 60s and 70s, but it ends their career on a solid note.


Best rock record ever featuring Stephen Hawkings

But after that, not much else to say. The second album under the Pink Floyd name without Roger Waters seriously misses his presence, especially in the lyrics division. The album is, conceptually, about relationships splitting apart ("Division Bell," get it?), and minus the subtext of Gilmour's acrimony towards Waters, you'd think this was a divorce album.

The bluesy "What Do You Want From Me" is the hardest song here. With a biting lyric and Gilmour's standard fluid guitar leads, it is probably the most obvious FU to the former band member. However, the concept strains itself and becomes too obvious by the time you hit songs like "Wearing The Inside Out" or "Lost for Words." If it weren't for Hawkings' voice on "Keep Talking," it would be a wholly forgettable song.

The best of the rest are "A Great Day For Freedom" and "High Hopes." "Great Day" finds our unhappy protagonist marveling at the fall of The Berlin Wall, yet forlornly wondering why inner peace is so far from his grasp. "High Hopes" looks back to the days of "magnets and miracles,' and then stares in the face of dashed hopes and disillusionment. The rest of "The Division Bell," however, doesn't measure up to previous full-band classics like Wish You Were Here or The Wall. Completists may need this, but others can proceed with caution.


Genius

David Gilmour is as much of a musical genius as anyone else who has ever carried the Floyd name. I love this album as much as anything Waters did solo or was involved with before the band fragmented.


Full discussion: http://www.hulver.com/scoop/story/2008/5/22/102411/126