New Doctor's clothes?

Good   2 votes - 100 %
Bad   0 votes - 0 %
 
2 Total Votes
Who clothes. by Merekat (4.00 / 1) #1 Mon Nov 13, 2017 at 02:39:19 AM EST
Sorry, but culottes are never practical. Esp. if you go to use a public toilet.

Also by anonimouse (2.00 / 0) #8 Thu Nov 16, 2017 at 05:51:04 AM EST
 Each incarnation of the Doctor lives for years and maybe even centuries and yet I have not seen the Doctor wear a change of clothes. Are his/her clothes similarly immortal?

Girls come and go but a mortgage is for 25 years -- JtL
[ Parent ]
I don't know, but by Herring (2.00 / 0) #9 Thu Nov 16, 2017 at 02:13:44 PM EST
Nicola Bryant's outfits will live forever in my memory.

You can't inspire people with facts
- Small Gods

[ Parent ]
Tax havens by Herring (4.00 / 1) #2 Mon Nov 13, 2017 at 12:38:19 PM EST
An interesting suggestion I heard a while back was this: the WTO - and international trade in general - as rules about state aid, subsidies etc. Why not introduce a rule for a minimum corporation tax rate?

Possible downsides are:

  1. The powerful plutocrats would be against it
  2. The "minimum" then becomes a target and all countries end up tending towards it
  3. Someone will work out a way around it


You can't inspire people with facts
- Small Gods

Is #2 a downside? by dark nowhere (4.00 / 1) #3 Mon Nov 13, 2017 at 09:19:31 PM EST
I was thinking about this recently. My worry is that if you managed to normalize everything between nations, the divides within nations might grow.

It's a cynical thing to say, but the rich want that divide. It's natural to want status, so I hope it's not too controversial. Point is, there's a lot of pressure in keeping things unbalanced in one way or another.

See you, space cowboy.

[ Parent ]
Which taxes aren't? by ambrosen (4.00 / 1) #5 Tue Nov 14, 2017 at 07:55:18 AM EST
The economy is based around the needs of the general public, so the actual details of how corporation tax percolates through to consumers actually matters.

[ Parent ]
I've read some stupid things today, but that... by marvin (2.00 / 0) #7 Tue Nov 14, 2017 at 09:44:25 PM EST
Do you write letters to the editor in small cities perchance? The ones I skimmed through today were at your level.

"public sector workers who don't actually pay tax, due to said tax being funded by taxation"

Wow. You should get in touch with this fucking retard. You'd have a lot in common:

https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-story-211272-10-.htm#211272


[ Parent ]
You work in banking still? by marvin (2.00 / 0) #11 Thu Nov 16, 2017 at 10:44:52 PM EST
Who funded quantitative easing and rescues of those deemed "too big to fail"? Who paid for bailouts which kept the bonus programs pouring out undeserved money to incompetent banksters who were absolute shit at their jobs?

Society benefits a whole lot more from the work of the teachers who educate kids, the doctors and nurses who save lives, the waterworks guys who keep our drinking water safe, food inspectors, and pothole repairmen than it does from a bunch of worthless grifters who abuse the trust of others for their own enrichment through varied inventive forms of financial trickery.

Of the two groups which suckle the most at the teat of the state and the expense of the public - civil servants and big business - only one has people who at least earned some of their money.

[ Parent ]
And neither are you by marvin (2.00 / 0) #13 Fri Nov 17, 2017 at 10:14:32 PM EST
If employed by a bank.

[ Parent ]
So what you're saying is ... by lm (4.00 / 1) #14 Sat Nov 18, 2017 at 06:57:24 AM EST
... the right to sell your labor for a wage only applies to private sector employees. Consequently the money that public sector employees earn doesn't belong to them.

Does this also extend to private sector employees paid by firms that have government contracts and private sector firms that enjoy various types of public subsidies?


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic
[ Parent ]
Tax incidence puzzle by Alan Crowe (2.00 / 0) #16 Sun Nov 19, 2017 at 11:43:24 AM EST
I hope that gmd is alluding to this puzzle over tax incidence. There is a serious discussion of the issue in the comments.

[ Parent ]