As an aside: https://cogsci.stackexchange.com/questions/17174/what-is-the-correlation-between-grit-and-big-5-conscientiousness
I was hoping (and still am, a little) his memo would bring a watershed moment. In my opinion it's almost a perfect document, not because it's entirely right, but because it's probably mostly wrong. But it's right in one way the literature virtually never mentions:
We need to talk, and it's okay to be wrong.
Few analyses mention this, even though he wrote about it. When they do, they talk about how we need to be able to talk, but don't really embrace the acceptability of being wrong. The fact is, our heads are networks of classifiers, from one perspective, and they're not perfect and simply cannot be. We will always believe wrong things to some extent.
Right or wrong aside, about a year ago I noticed the twitter crowd being very hostile to science and sound logic they didn't agree with. At some point the argument they shouldn't have to suffer emotionally because of all the suffering they've endured already at the hands of rationalizing oppressors. I can appreciate the sentiment, but it's definitely not going to help anything.
The author of this analysis spends an inordinate amount of space on themself, which I think is poor form. I doubt the drafts of all my resumes concatenated would reach that length, but I scrolled past it as quickly as possible.
This is a bit of a problem. When trying to convince a crowd made up partly of people who regard the gender queer as largely attention-seeking drama queens (pardon the expression), this amounts to fuel for the fire. This isn't needed to convince the choir. An infobox-sized bio would serve everyone better.
I've no doubt that there are some guilty of bad-faith attention seeking, though I know nearly as many people in real life as I've heard of online, so the perception to which it is justified is likely based on the vocal minority. Another issue is the mentally ill exist in all groups, and some people will conflate group membership with symptoms of the illness. Although I believe that's more often malicious than not.
Attention-seeking behavior in this space is fundamentally damaging, I think. Even simply to gain a following to support your fellow X. This promotes groupthink around your position and closes down any honest discussion of controversial ideas. I worry about an egoist being more likely to make disingenuous statements, and to create controversy and animosity simply to feed their own popularity. I don't know if it's true or to what degree it has an effect, but I've been a victim of the former effect and watched as many, many, many more from various positions have been its victim as well.See you, space cowboy.
For a lot of other people knee pain comes from pushing distance too far too fast. Ramping up the distance slowly does wonders for more people than you might think.
If you're pushing the distance at a safe pace and you've got shoes that match your gait, it might be time to look for a sports physiotherapist to get your gait analyzed. Outside of the wrong shoes and being too aggressive in pushing distance, having bad form is chief cause of pain from running.
Personally I've never hit a trail, jogging path, or street route where the unevenness was uniformly on one side or the other for my whole run. But after I heard about people running into that sort of issue I started paying more attention and I noticed that there are some suburbs where the streets are almost uniformly bowed. If you run on the same side of the street (relative to your direction) and always run in the street, that can cause problems.