?

Just that lecture course was bollocks   2 votes - 66 %
Social Deviance theory is bollocks   0 votes - 0 %
Sociology is bollocks   1 vote - 33 %
 
3 Total Votes
Christianity and a polar world by lm (4.00 / 2) #1 Sat Feb 09, 2008 at 10:17:01 AM EST
Christianity in many places was eventually colored by local traditions and themes. For example, look at the folk tale the Grim brothers collected about the 12 apostles being brothers and too good to die so they were frozen in a cave until the advent of the Lord. Another example is witch burning which was an ages old tradition of some of the Germanic tribes. The early Christian emperors outlawed this practice because they figured the witches had no real power. But as the centuries rolled on, the folk belief in witchcraft outlasted Roman law in some areas and witch burning was taken back up.

That said, I do think it fair to say that there are many forms of Christianity do live in a polar world with angels behind every tree and demons under every rock. From your description, my first guess is that Wolpe was raised in such a milieu and it colors all of his analysis.

Also, I was required to take a course on sociology in 1990 as part of my first attempt through college. At that point my estimation was that it didn't deserve to be considered any form of science. I've never been tempted to see if things have changed much since.

re Heisbourg. Meh. He's probably right about McCain. But his ignorance of what the record of the Democratic candidates is illustrated by appealing to the Clinton years for examples of what the policies might be.


There is no more degenerate kind of state than that in which the richest are supposed to be the best.
Cicero, The Republic


Socialogy by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #2 Sat Feb 09, 2008 at 12:54:28 PM EST
It has almost amused me at how a "science" that studies the cultural biases of societies is so bad at seeing the cultural biases in the subculture of people who call themselves sociologists.
----
ウセーバラケダ
[ Parent ]

Sociology is a different form of science by Dr H0ffm4n (2.00 / 0) #5 Mon Feb 11, 2008 at 05:55:20 AM EST
Necessarily so. If one narrows the definition of science such that only those subjects with an observation, hypothesis, experimental cycle qualify, then the majority of sociology can never be scientific since the experiments are simply impossible to perform. Inevitably it becomes harder to weed out quackery. Does this mean that the questions of sociology should not be investigated and hypothesising is meaningless?

[ Parent ]

"Science" by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #6 Mon Feb 11, 2008 at 11:25:15 AM EST
It is a different for of *study*. If it can't use the scientific method, then it shouldn't be labeled "science".
----
ウセーバラケダ
[ Parent ]

Does the scientific method require experiments? by Dr H0ffm4n (4.00 / 1) #8 Mon Feb 11, 2008 at 12:09:31 PM EST
Or merely tests for the hypotheses?

[ Parent ]

Ugh by ammoniacal (4.00 / 1) #3 Sat Feb 09, 2008 at 02:18:44 PM EST
Leave it to a techie like C4L to unquestioningly parrot Kennedy's instructions. This practice is so fucking unethical that I feel like puking after reading about it.

I'm sure that the Nazi scientists had a great time discussing the merits of Zyklon B, just like this here 'blog chatter! Fuck Kennedy for promoting this shite.

Irony: ammo says it's time. Tom is blocked.


Well by TheophileEscargot (4.00 / 1) #4 Sun Feb 10, 2008 at 04:53:49 PM EST
In his example it's all being done in the browser. None of this information is being passed back to the server, though I suppose you could do it with a form submit.
--
"Everything is vague to a degree you do not realize till you have tried to make it precise." -- Bertrand Russell
[ Parent ]

Sending information to the server. by ucblockhead (4.00 / 1) #7 Mon Feb 11, 2008 at 11:30:02 AM EST
That's what XMLHTTPRequest is for.
----
ウセーバラケダ
[ Parent ]