Hulver's site || Comments || Modest 3D effects with SVG, version 2.0.

woo woo by sasquatchan (2.00 / 0) #11 Fri Feb 24, 2006 at 10:13:53 AM EST

test the maths out

Dragging: -2, -100
Rendered X: -Infinity
Rendered Y: NaN
Z-depth?: Not visible.
x: -0.2 Y: 0 z: 0

Dude. by Driusan (4.00 / 1) #12 Fri Feb 24, 2006 at 10:35:20 AM EST

That's the awesomest splotch of off-redish-orange I've seen since the last time I had to solve a 3 variable polynomial to model the colour of an areola in a photo I was uploading to a website made by someone who had a moral opposition to tags for fear they might result in people thinking it's possible to have sex acts with more than 2 people.
--
I needed a new sig. And now I have one.
[ Parent ]

: Haha. by NoMoreNicksLeft (2.00 / 0) #13 Fri Feb 24, 2006 at 03:44:32 PM EST

Actions, by the ontology I've created, do only have two participants. If you believe that to be a flaw, list some examples that require either only 1, or more than two.
If you like, you can google for at least a dozen tag-based porn systems out there. Me not making yet another one has not crippled that one particular idea.
--
Do not look directly into laser with remaining good eye.
[ Parent ]

Yeh. by NoMoreNicksLeft (4.00 / 1) #14 Fri Feb 24, 2006 at 03:48:33 PM EST

The camera is at 0,0,0. That's not only expected, but perfectly valid. Back the Z off into the positive, hit the button and see if it doesn't recover. Hell, it -might- even still be draggable at this point.

Sorry if I didn't have time to write some portal based clipping system along with collisions that would keep -MY SINGLE RENDERED XYZ POINT- from colliding with the camera and giving you a funky picture to make fun of me with on Husi.

Oh, and btw, that's almost the -exact- picture of how well IE7 does the acid2 test. I think it has a pixel or two of yellow down in the right corner randomly...
--
Do not look directly into laser with remaining good eye.
[ Parent ]