IRO by ChiefHoser (2.00 / 0) #4 Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 12:39:15 PM EST
They look to be fairly good. The frame geometry seems nice.

I have also been considering the Kona single speed frames (unit and the sutra, too lazy to find a link). Instead of the horizontal rear axle mount, they have a secondary hanger attached to the frame with two bolts. The axle is still in the same position as a more traditional frame, but provides a stronger mounting position for the wheel (in terms of front to back) and lessens the chance of slippage within the axle mount.
--------------

Chiefhoser
[ Parent ]

takeup hanger by ad hoc (2.00 / 0) #5 Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 01:14:01 PM EST
I'm not a fan of those takeup hanger things. One of the main reason I have a SS is so I don't have to deal with snow, salt, and sand in the winter and that looks to me like it would be a mess. I'd go for the real, horizontal FIX/SS dropouts. I've never had an axel slip.

I have the IRO Rob Roy which has room for wider tires and fender. The Mark V is really a courier's bike. It only accepts narrow tires and no fenders.
--
Once you get used to the idea that everything is equally true, decisions get much easier. -- johnny
[ Parent ]

Snow and ice by ChiefHoser (2.00 / 0) #6 Mon Nov 06, 2006 at 01:24:33 PM EST
Its the same reason I started with a SS as well. I haven't seen the kona frame (or like design) up close yet, but it doesn't seem like it would be any greater of a problem than any other part of the bike.

I've been trying to find a decent aluminum SS frame because of the massive salt loads dropped on the roads here, but most seem to be cro-mo. I need a bike that is painted with a teflon derived paint. Or some kind of spray that I can reapply (without decreasing the strength of the welds).

The surly 1x1 and karate monkey both allow for narrower and wider style wheels, so for me that is a plus, as I would like have two sets of wheels for the SS.
--------------

Chiefhoser
[ Parent ]

Login
Make a new account
Username:
Password: